My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
375
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540905
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 10:22:54 AM
Creation date
2/3/2020 9:23:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0540905
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023406
FACILITY_NAME
SIERRA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS
STREET_NUMBER
375
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
147120808
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
375 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sierra Lumber Case#2 July 2014 <br /> 375 Hazelton Avenue, Stockton <br /> Claim No: 8478 <br /> Objections to Closure and Responses <br /> According to the Path to Closure page in GeoTracker, finalized on December 16, 2013, the <br /> County opposes closure because: <br /> • Inadequate conceptual site model. <br /> RESPONSE: Adequate data is available in GeoTracker to prepare a conceptual site <br /> model. <br /> • Secondary source remains. <br /> RESPONSE: Secondary source as defined by the Policy was removed by excavation <br /> and active remediation. <br /> • The case does not meet Policy groundwater criteria. <br /> RESPONSE: We concur. <br /> • The case does not meet Policy vapor criteria. <br /> RESPONSE: The case meets Policy Criterion 2b. <br /> Recommendation <br /> The dual phase extraction system does not appear to be effective to achieve Policy criteria. <br /> The Fund recommends that the County direct the responsible party to define the extent of <br /> groundwater contamination as required by Policy criteria and evaluate alternative remedial <br /> technologies to achieve water quality objectives. <br /> —71zs° <br /> Kirk Larson, P.G. Date 'RobertTr6mmer, C.H.G. Date <br /> Engineering Geologist Senior Engineering Geologist <br /> Technical Review Unit Chief, Technical Review Unit <br /> (916) 341-5663 (916) 341-5684 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.