Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Harding Lawson Associates <br /> December 20, 1994 <br /> 256661 <br /> ' San Joaquin County <br /> Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> Page 6 <br /> ' highest concentrations were reported in sample WS-1 located adjacent to and downgradient of the Site <br /> A UST excavation (Plate 2) Toluene and xylene were also reported Sample WS-2 at concentrations of <br /> 12 ug/1 and 39 ug/l, respectively <br /> 1 The groundwater sample collected from the Site A well MW-A1 located approximately 45 feet <br /> downgradient of the UST excavation was reported as not containing TPHg and BTEX above the <br /> method reporting hints <br /> Site B <br /> ' Detectable concentrations of TVHC were reported in soil gas samples SG-2 (77,000 ug/1) and SG-5 (0 5 <br /> ug/1) (Table 1) SG-2 was located adjacent and downgradient of the former UST while SG-5 was <br /> located approximately 45 feet northeast and downgradient of the former UST location (Plate 3) BTEX <br /> ' were detected only in sample SG-2, however the concentration of benzene could not be quantified due <br /> to interference on the chromatogram <br /> The groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-B1 was reported to contain 7 1 mg/1 <br /> ' TPHg, 2,200 ug/l benzene, 600 ug/l toluene, 440 ug/1 ethylbenzene and 1,100 ug/1 xylenes (Table 2) <br /> Organic lead was not detected above the method reporting limit <br /> Fuel Oil Bunker <br /> BTEX was not reported in the two soil samples collected from below the bunker TPHd varied from. <br /> 4,100 mg/kg to 7,100 mg/kg and TRPH varied from 520 mg/kg to 1,800 mg/kg The higher <br /> concentrations of TPHd and TRPH were reported for the sample collected from the south end of the <br /> bunker <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Groundwater data collected on October 19, 1994 indicates that groundwater at the facility flows to the <br /> 1 northeast at a gradient of 0 001 to 0 003 Site specific or local groundwater flow regimes have not <br /> been determined <br /> Based on the data collected during this investigation, groundwater approximately 45 feet downgradient <br /> of the Site A excavation does not appear to be impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons Soils in this <br /> vicinity may be impacted as evidenced by PID measurements and odor <br /> Groundwater in the vicinity of the former Site B UST has been impacted by TPHg and BTEX <br /> Benzene was reported in the groundwater sample from MW-B1 at 2,200 ug/1 The maximum <br /> contaminant level (MCL) for benzene established for the benefit of human health and welfare by both <br /> state and federal agencies is 0 5 ug/1 Organic lead was not detected in groundwater from the Site B <br /> monitoring well <br /> Soils below both ends of the bunker appear to be impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as <br /> TPHd and TRPH <br />