Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROJECT STATUS <br /> As measured this quarter, the groundwater flow direction and gradient remain consistent with <br /> historical trends <br /> ' Concentrations of dissolved gasoline hydrocarbons in the groundwater samples collected this <br /> ' quarter continue to decline, However, the lateral extent of MTBE remains undefined Groundwater <br /> from Irrigation Well#2 did not contain detectable concentrations of any of the gasoline constituent <br /> compounds analyzed <br /> On February 7, 20g <br /> 01 Ramage Environmental met with PHS/EHD and RWQCB at the site to <br /> ' discuss a corrective action strategy On February 13, 2001, Ramage Environmental documented <br /> the results of the meeting and requested written regulatory directive <br /> ' On March 16, 2001, PHSIEHD directed that a work plan be submitted to further define the extent of <br /> deeper groundwater-bearing intervals, to install a monitoring well cluster downgradient of the <br /> existing monitoring well network, and to continue quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> On April 23, 2001, the UST Cleanup Fund pre-approved the cost to prepare and submit the <br /> '+ requested work plan Currently, the work plan is in preparation, and should be submitted by the <br /> end of May 2001 <br /> Based on these conclusions, Ramage Environmental recommends the following course of <br /> environmental corrective action <br /> 1 Continue to monitor and sample groundwater from all nine monitoring wells and Irrigation Well <br /> #2 on a quarterly basis The next quarterly groundwater monitoring is scheduled for May 2001 <br /> The next groundwater monitoring report should be published during July 2001 <br /> ' 2 Submit the requested work plan, gain regulatory approval of the proposed scope of work, and <br /> secure cost pre-approval from the UST Cleanup Fund for the work plan implementation Upon <br /> ' cost pre-approval, schedule and implement the scope of work <br /> 7 <br />