My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2020
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
3437
>
2231-2238 – Tiered Permitting Program
>
PR0507000
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2021 12:44:02 PM
Creation date
2/3/2020 10:47:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2231-2238 – Tiered Permitting Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2020
RECORD_ID
PR0507000
PE
2231
FACILITY_ID
FA0007094
FACILITY_NAME
APPLIED AEROSPACE STRUCTURES CORP
STREET_NUMBER
3437
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17702033
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3437 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item#202 <br /> The dye penetrant process is used to detect any cracks in the part. The dye penetrant (ZL-67) is applied <br /> to the part using a paint brush so it completely covers the part. It is allowed to dwell on the part for 30 <br /> minutes. This allows enough time for the ZL-67 to penetrate any cracks or voids. After 30 minutes the <br /> part is thoroughly rinsed off according to ASTM E1417. The standard requires low water pressure (we <br /> use 20 psi) and the water spray nozzle must be 12" away from the part while rinsing off the ZL-67. Very <br /> little of the dye penetrant is used and a large amount of water is required to thoroughly remove all the <br /> dye penetrant. If not thoroughly rinsed, the dye penetrant left on the part could interfere with <br /> inspector's ability to notice cracks. After completely rinsing the part, it is inspected under a black light <br /> and any cracks or voids will be easily seen. If the ZL-67 is less than 10%of the rinsewater generated, I <br /> believe that the toxicity characteristic would not apply. <br /> Item#204 <br /> Based on the definition of treatment in Title 22 California Code of Regulations, Section 66260.10, we do <br /> not feel that compacting our waste meets this definition. There are 2 parts to the definition. The first <br /> part states that"Treatment" means any method,technique, or process which changes or is designed to <br /> change the physical, chemical, or biological character or composition of any hazardous waste or any <br /> material contained therein. Compacting does not change the physical, chemical or biological character <br /> or composition of the waste. The second part states treatment removes or reduces its harmful <br /> properties or characteristics for any purpose including, but not limited to, energy recovery, material <br /> recovery, or reduction in volume. Compacting of our waste does not remove or reduce its harmful <br /> properties or characteristics. If you still consider compacting as treatment, wouldn't that also mean that <br /> you couldn't push the waste down into the drum to make more room? What's the difference? <br /> We would consider the following to be examples of treatment: (1) Evaporating solvent or water from a <br /> waste changes the physical and chemical composition of the waste, and removes or reduces its harmful <br /> properties by reducing the volume. (2) Squeezing oil from an oil soaked absorbent boom changes the <br /> physical character and composition, and removes harmful properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.