My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002599
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
1112
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545263
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002599
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 6:56:17 PM
Creation date
2/3/2020 10:53:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002599
RECORD_ID
PR0545263
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005108
FACILITY_NAME
EGGIMANS HYDRAULIC GARAGE
STREET_NUMBER
1112
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15102101
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1112 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(VYATC <br /> A S S O C I A T i= S I iV C <br /> (DWR) groundwater well construction logs, and conducted a site walk in the vicinity of the site to <br /> identify any groundwater wells located within a 2,000-foot radius of the site This survey revealed <br /> 14 wells located within approximately 2,000 feet of the site The closest of these wells is located <br /> approximately 800 feet upgradient of the project site The receptor survey findings are summarized in <br /> ATC's Well Survey for Andrew and Edith Trust, for the Property at 1112 East Harding Way, <br /> Stockton, California, dated April 9, 1999 <br /> On April 11, 2000, a single soil boring (SB7) was advanced to approximately 65 feet bgs to evaluate <br /> whether groundwater had been impacted at the subject site Groundwater was initially encountered at <br /> approximately 45 feet bgs and a sample was subsequently collected from the soil boring using a <br /> Hydropunch® groundwater-sampling tool In order to determine the vertical extent of contamination <br /> in the most cost-effective manner, the soil boring was further advanced to a total completion depth of <br /> 66 5 ft bgs where field observations suggested the vertical extent of the petroleum hydrocarbons had <br /> been realized Analytical results and field observations indicated that soil and groundwater beneath <br /> the location of the former USTs were impacted by residual petroleum hydrocarbon constituents The <br /> vertical extent of impacted soil and groundwater appeared to be defined However, the lateral extent <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents at or near the groundwater interface was undefined <br /> Additional work to further characterize the extent of contamination was requested by the PHS/EHD <br /> in correspondence dated September 20, 2000 <br /> • On November 15 and 16, 2001, an ATC geologist supervised the advancement of three soil borings <br /> to approximately 54 to 55 feet bgs Soil borings were then completed as groundwater monitoring <br /> wells MW1, MW2, and MW3 The soil sample collected from boring MW2 at a depth of 35 5 feet <br /> bgs contained the highest concentrations of TPHg, ethyl benzene, and xylenes The soil samples <br /> collected from boring MW2 at depths of 30 feet bgs and 55 feet bgs contained only trace <br /> concentrations of TPHg, ethyl benzene, and/or xylenes The soil samples collected from borings <br /> MW1 and MW3 at depths of 35 feet bgs contained trace concentrations of xylenes and TPHg, <br /> respectively The samples collected from borings MW I and MW3 at depths of 40 feet bgs did not <br /> contain detectable concentrations of TPHg or BTEX Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), t-amyl <br /> methyl ether (TAME), t-butanol (TBA), ethyl t-butyl ether (ETBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), or 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) were not detected in any soil samples <br /> collected from borings MW1, MW2, and MW3, though the detection limits were elevated in the <br /> MW2 sample from 35 5 feet bgs due to the high concentrations of TPHg noted previously <br /> In July and December 2003, ATC conducted additional subsurface investigation activities at the site <br /> that included cone penetration testing, advancing a soil boring (SB8), and installation of monitoring <br /> wells MW4 through MW7 Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected from the <br /> boreholes of MW5 and MW6, and in the groundwater samples collected from MW4 through MW7 <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Groundwater level measurements were collected from monitoring wells MW1 through MW7 on <br /> April 9, 2004 Groundwater elevations ranged from --27 19 to —27 26, representing an average <br /> • increase in the groundwater table elevation of approximately 2 19 feet since January 2004 The <br /> water level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) Assuming <br /> that horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, shallow groundwater beneath the site generally flowed <br /> s lenvironmenta11224931Reportsl2QR-04 doc 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.