My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002600
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
1112
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545263
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 7:09:54 PM
Creation date
2/3/2020 10:53:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002600
RECORD_ID
PR0545263
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005108
FACILITY_NAME
EGGIMANS HYDRAULIC GARAGE
STREET_NUMBER
1112
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15102101
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1112 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> -qREGG GREGG IN SITU <br /> Environmental and Geotechnical Site Investigation Contractors <br /> GREGG IN SITU CIT Interpretations as of July 31,2002 (Release 11.20c) <br /> GREGG IN SITU's interpretation routine provides a tabular output of geotechnical parameters based on <br /> current published CPT correlations and is subject to change to reflect the current state of practice The <br /> interpreted values are not considered valid for all soil types The interpretations are presented only as a <br /> guide for geotechnical use and should be carefully scrutinized for consideration in any geotechnical <br /> design Reference to current literature is strongly recommended GREGG IN SITU, Inc and GREGG <br /> DRILLING &TESTING Inc do not warranty the correctness or the applicability of any of the geotechnical <br /> parameters interpreted by the program and can not assume liability for any use of the results in any design <br /> or review Representative hand calculations should be made for any parameter that is critical for design <br /> purposes The end user of the interpreted output should also be fully aware of the techniques and the <br /> limitations of any method used in this program The purpose of this document is to inform the user as to <br /> which methods were used and what the appropriate papers and/or publications are for further reference <br /> The CPT interpretations are based on values of tip, sleeve friction and pore pressure averaged over a <br /> user specified interval(e g 0 20m) Note that qt is the recorded tip value, q, corrected for pore pressure <br /> effects Since all GREGG IN SITU cones have equal end area friction sleeves, pore pressure corrections <br /> to sleeve friction, Fs, are not required <br /> The tip correction is qt=q.+ P-a} a u2 <br /> where qt is the corrected tip resistance <br /> q,is the recorded tip resistance <br /> uZ is the recorded dynamic pore pressure behind the tip(uz position) <br /> a is the Net Area Ratio for the cone(typically 0 85 for GREGG IN SITU cones) <br /> The total stress calculations are based on soil unit weights that have been assigned to the Soil Behavior <br /> Type zones, from a user defined unit weight profile or by using a single value throughout the profile <br /> Effective vertical overburden stresses are calculated based on a hydrostatic distribution of equilibrium <br /> pore pressures below the water table or from a user defined equilibrium pore pressure profile(this can be <br /> obtained from CPT dissipation tests) For over water projects the effects of the column of water have <br /> been taken in to account as has the appropnate unit weight of water How this is done depends on where <br /> the instruments were zeroed (i a on deck or at mud line) <br /> Details regarding the interpretation methods for all of the interpreted parameters are provided in Table 1 <br /> The appropriate references cited in Table 1 are listed in Table 2 Where methods are based on charts or <br /> techniques that are too complex to describe in this summary the user should reference to the cited <br /> references <br /> The estimated Soil Behavior Types (normalized and non-normahzed)are based on the charts developed <br /> by Robertson and Campanella shown in Figures 1 and 2 <br /> Where the results of a calculationAnterpretation are declared 'invand'the value will be represented by the <br /> text stnngs"-9999"or"-9999 0" Invalid results will occur because of(and not limited to)one or a <br /> combination of- <br /> 1 Invalid or undefined CPT data(e g drilled out section or data gap) <br /> 2 Where the interpretation method is inappropriate, for example, drained parameters in an <br /> undrained material (and vice versa) <br /> 3 Where interpretation input values are beyond the range of the referenced charts or specified <br /> limitations of the interpretation method <br /> 4 Where pre-requisite or intermediate interpretation calculations are invalid <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.