Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton <br /> Consulting Engineers <br /> 3336 Bradshaw Road,Suite 140 <br /> Sacramento, California 95827 <br /> 916-362-3251 <br /> 12 September 1990 FAX 916-362-9915 <br /> Mr. Keith M. Casto, Esq. <br /> Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel , Inc. <br /> 60 South Market Street SEP �P�NEP� <br /> San Jose, CA 95113-2396 SEN v�SES <br /> Subject: Soil Investigation Report �R <br /> Jamina Investment Properties <br /> Acampo, California <br /> K/J/C 902510.00 <br /> Dear Mr. Casto: <br /> In accordance with our Agreement executed 15 June 1990, Kennedy/Jenks/Chilton <br /> is pleased to submit this letter report presenting the results of our soil <br /> investigation at the Jamina Investments Property located in Acampo, <br /> California. The report provides descriptions of the procedures used for <br /> sample collection and analysis, and laboratory results. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The Jamina Investments Property (site) is comprised of approximately 30 acres <br /> of agricultural land located at the corner of Woodbridge and Hildebrand Roads, <br /> near Acampo, California. Figure 1 is a plat map showing the location of the <br /> site (Parcel Nos. 25 and 58) . Approximately two acres in the southwest corner <br /> of Parcel 25 are planted with almond trees while the remainder of the land is <br /> planted as vineyards. <br /> The purpose of the soil investigation conducted at the site was to obtain <br /> information regarding the presence or absence of dichlorobromopropane (DBCP) <br /> in site soil . A sampling and analysis plan, dated 25 July 1990, for <br /> conducting the soil investigation was submitted to the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Division (SJCEHD) for approval . Because there had been <br /> no reported usage of DBCP on the property, the sampling plan was designed for <br /> collection of representative samples of soil from various depths. Sampling <br /> locations were randomly selected using a grid. The sampling depths were <br /> selected to obtain samples of soil where residual DBCP concentrations would be <br /> expected to occur if DBCP had been used at the site. DBCP uses were banned in <br /> 1977. Because DBCP is relatively volatile and soluble, it would not be <br /> expected to persist in surface soil . Therefore, sample collection depths of <br /> two to eight feet were proposed. The sampling and analysis plan was verbally <br /> approved by the SJCEHD on 21 August 1990. <br />