Laserfiche WebLink
far MTBE is predicted to migrate and 2) to estimate the amount of time predicted for MTBE <br /> L, levels to reach the secondary MCL. <br /> To accomplish these goals, Stratus employed the use of USEPA's BIOSCREEN (version 1.4; <br /> July 1997). BIOSCREEN is a screening model which simulates remediation through natural <br /> attenuation of dissolved-phase hydrocarbons or fuel additives. The software, programmed in the <br /> Microsoft Excel spreadsheet environment and based on the Domenico analytical solute transport <br /> model, has the ability to simulate advection, dispersion, adsorption, and aerobic decay as well as <br /> anaerobic reactions that have been shown to be the dominant biodegradation processes at many <br /> petroleum release sites. BIOSCREEN includes three different model types: (1) solute transport <br /> without decay, (2) solute transport with biodegradation modeled as a first-order decay process <br /> (simple, lumped-parameter approach), and (3) solute transport with biodegradation modeled as <br /> an instantaneous biodegradation reaction with multiple soluble electron acceptors including <br /> dissolved oxygen, nitrate, and sulfate. Since MTBE has been clearly demonstrated to be <br /> naturally attenuating in groundwater at the site and site-specific half-lives can be estimated from <br /> graphs, Stratus used BIOSCREEN to model solute transport with biodegradation as a first-order <br /> decay process. <br /> The model was run for both Sand A and Sand B, while making the conservative assumption that <br /> the two sand units are hydrologically separate (although likely not the case). The model results <br /> were validated using quarterly groundwater sampling data and comparing it to the modeled <br /> conditions over time. <br /> 5.2.1 Model Input Parameters <br /> The input parameters for the BIOSCREEN model were a combination of site-specific data, <br /> standard values, textbook values, and recommended model values. Solute concentrations in <br /> groundwater were converted from µg/L (as reported by laboratories) to mg/1 for use in the <br /> model. Key input parameters into the model are discussed below. <br /> Hydrogeology: Sand A- and Sand B-specific values for hydraulic gradient, porosity, and <br /> hydraulic conductivity were used to calculate seepage velocity. In both Sand A and Sand B, an <br /> average historic hydraulic gradient of 0.0005 ft/ft was used. For both Sands A and B, a porosity <br /> value of 0.30 (30%) was selected based on typical values provided in the BIOSCREEN User's <br /> Manual. Hydraulic conductivity values were estimated for each unit based on typical values <br /> provided in the BIOSCREEN User's Manual for sand and silty sands, then fine-tuned during the <br /> model calibration for each unit. Hydraulic conductivity values of 2.9x10-2 cm/sec for Sand A <br /> and 1.3x10-Z cm/sec for Sand B were used (see additional discussion in Section 5.2.2 below). <br /> Dispersion: The estimated plume lengths in the A and B zones were estimated to be the distance <br /> between the well MW-1 and the estimated 5.0 µg/1 MTBE isoconcentration contour line beneath <br /> Interstate 5 (approximately 400 feet in Sand A and 300 feet in Sand B). Longitudinal, <br /> transverse, and vertical dispersivity values were calculated by BIOSCREEN using the plume <br /> lengths. <br /> Page 19 STRATUS <br />