Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROJECT STATUS <br /> Between June 9, and August 23, 2004, the groundwater surface dropped <br /> an average of 1 29 feet, <br /> the groundwater gradient increased from 0 0020 to 0 0022 foot/foot, and the general direction of <br /> groundwater flow remained toward the east The groundwater surface configuration appears to <br /> be consistent with historical and seasonal trends <br /> Between June 9, and August 23, 2004, the concentrations ofasoline compounds pounds m groundwater <br /> generally decreased in MW-2 and MW-6, and increased slightly in MW-4 Gasoline hydrocarbons <br /> are concentrated as free product near former UST#3, and concentrations of gasoline compounds <br /> decrease with distance from the source area As shown on the isoconcentration maps, the lateral <br /> extent of MTBE in groundwater is mostly defined (Figure 7), and the lateral extents of TPH-as- <br /> gasoline and benzene in groundwater remain undefined to the west of the source area (Figures 5 <br /> and 6) The vertical extent of impacted groundwater has not been investigated <br /> On October 5, 2004, the thickness of free product in MW-1 increased significantly Consistent <br /> with the trends for 2003, the increase may be due to the seasonal lowering of the groundwater <br /> table during the summer and fail months <br /> Based on these conclusions, Ramage Environmental recommends that the previously-approved <br /> remedial feasibility testing tasks be initiated during the first quarter of 2005 The first task should <br /> be the installation of the nested soil vapor extraction well and nested air sparge/soil vapor <br /> extraction well During this drilling work, another groundwater monitoring well should be installed <br /> to the west of MW-6, to further define the lateral extent of impacted groundwater In the <br /> meantime, monthly free product removal and quarterly groundwater monitoring should continue <br /> 7 <br />