Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 3 0 CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROJECT STATUS <br /> Between March 23, and June 29, 2005, the groundwater surface rose an average of 1 54 feet, the <br /> groundwater gradient remained constant at 0 002 foot/foot, and the direction of groundwater flow <br /> shifted slightly toward the east-southeast The groundwater surface configuration appears to be <br /> consistent with historical and seasonal trends <br /> Between March 23, and June 29, 2005, the concentrations of gasoline compounds in groundwater <br /> remained relatively stable Gasoline hydrocarbons are concentrated as free product near former <br /> UST ##3 and concentrations of <br /> gasoline compounds decrease with distance from the source area <br />' As shown on the isoconcentration maps, the lateral extent of TPH-as-gasoline and benzene are <br /> defined (Figures 5 and 6), and the lateral extent of MTBE in groundwater is mostly defined (Figure <br /> 7) The vertical extent of impacted groundwater has not been investigated <br /> Duringthe second quarter of 2 <br /> q 005, approximately 5 0 ounces of free product were removed from <br /> MW-1 in three monthly site visits <br /> Ramage Environmental recommends that upon the availability of funding, the previously-approved <br /> Mremedial feasibility testing tasks be completed In the meantime, monthly free product removal <br /> and quarterly groundwater monitoring should continue <br /> 1 <br />' 7 <br /> 1 <br />