Laserfiche WebLink
Subsurface Investigation Report-Tosco(Former 8P)Service Station No. 11195 Lathrop,California <br /> G,�f April 11,2002 <br /> 5.3 Groundwater Analytical Data and Mass of MtBE Removed <br /> MtBE concentrations from the grab groundwater samples and groundwater samples from quarterly monitoring <br /> events were used to estimate the mass of MtBE removed in groundwater purged from the UST pit, CC-WS, <br /> MW-3, MW-5 and MW-10 at the site. An estimated MtBE concentration for each purging event was derived <br /> from averaging MtBE concentrations from groundwater samples collected on the dates prior to and following <br /> the corresponding purging event. The estimated concentrations were used to calculate the MtBE mass <br /> removed during each event. Based on this method, the estimated total MtBE mass removed in groundwater <br /> purged from the CC-WS, MW-3,MW-5 and MW-10 between May 5, 2000 and February 7, 2002 are 1.16, <br /> 1.84, 11.39 and 5.16 pounds, respectively. The estimated amount of MtBE removed from the site since the <br /> start date of January 19, 1999 is 66.00 pounds. The estimated amount of MtBE removed for each event, the <br /> cumulative MtBE removed, and the calculation methods are summarized in Table 4. <br /> 6.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the results of the.recent installation of five Geoprobe borings at the site, the lateral extent of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon impact to soil has been defined. The lateral extent of hydrocarbon impact to <br /> groundwater downgradient of the site is defined for all constituents except methyl tertiary butyl ether(MtBE). <br /> Grab groundwater concentrations from the Geoprobes (Table 1) show that MtBE was detected in four of the <br /> five Geoprobe borings at concentrations ranging from 3 to 10,000 parts per billion (ppb) by EPA Method <br /> 8260. <br /> Therefore, in an attempt to provide lateral delineation of the hydrocarbon impact to groundwater, GR <br /> recommends the installation of four groundwater monitoring wells at the proposed locations shown on the <br /> attached Figure 2. GR recommends that the new monitoring wells be added to the existing monitoring and <br /> sampling program, and that the new wells be sampled for a minimum of four consecutive quarters, over the <br /> course of one hydrologic cycle. In addition, GR recommends continuation of the current monitoring and <br /> sampling program at the subject site. <br /> GR proposes the following schedule for the installation of additional groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> 1. A Work Plan detailing the field methods, specifications and analytical procedures for the proposed <br /> monitoring wells will be submitted by April 26, 2002. <br /> 2. Offsite access agreements have been obtained, but final approval must be obtained from the offiste owners <br /> prior to installation of the monitoring wells. <br /> 3. The proposed monitoring wells will.be installed by May 31, 2002,pending approval of the offsite owners <br /> and the PHS-EHD. <br /> 4. A monitoring well installation report will be submitted by July 26, 2002. <br /> 5. A Corrective Action Plan (CAP)which includes a Feasibility Study will be submitted by August 30,2002. <br /> 140193.11-2 <br /> 7 <br />