Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dave Lewis <br /> January 28, 1987 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Dissolved hydrocarbons have been detected in monitoring well <br /> 11 on more than one occasion suggesting that the plume is close <br /> to domestic well 9135 . Although sampling of this well through <br /> January 19 , 1987 has not detected dissolved hydrocarbon concen- <br /> trations above method detection limits, Groundwater Technology <br /> recommends that a contingency plan be formulated in the event <br /> that the weekly sampling of this domestic well indicates the <br /> presence of dissolved hydrocarbons . Should it be warrented, we <br /> would recommend the installation of a liquid phase carbon <br /> filtration system at the wellhead. If the carbon filtration <br /> system needs to be activated the sampling frequency should be <br /> increased to (bi-weekly) twice a week, to verify the presence or <br /> absence of hydrocarbon constituents within the well and to <br /> monitor the effectiveness of the treatment system. <br /> The present schedule for sampling includes; weekly sampling <br /> of monitoring well 11 and domestic well 9135, bi-monthly sampling <br /> of five other domestic wells and monthly sampling of the moni- <br /> toring wells at the site. Groundwater Technology recommends that <br /> this sampling frequency be continued unless future site condi- <br /> tions dictate otherwise. <br /> At this time, it is Groundwater Technology' s opinion that <br /> excavation of soils beneath the site is not the best approach to <br /> addressing the residual soil contamination. The location of <br /> existing remedial abatement systems and monitoring points <br /> containing free product in the area of highest residual soil <br /> contamination would either severely limit the extent of ex- <br /> cavation or require the removal and replacement of the remedi- <br /> ation systems and monitoring points . As outlined in Groundwater <br /> Technology' s correspondance dated October 13, 1986, Soil Contami- <br /> nation Abatement Options, Groundwater Technology believes that <br /> the best approach for this site is soil venting. Subsequent to <br /> the startup and testing of the presently existing initial soil <br /> venting system which was installed to prevent vapor impact of the <br /> adjacent buildings, Groundwater Technology recommends that the <br /> effectiveness of a more comprehensive soil venting system be <br /> evaluated for remediation of subsurface soil contamination. <br /> Testing of the initial soil venting system is schedule for the <br /> week of February 1, 1987. <br />