My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009051
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 12:26:47 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 10:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009051
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0000649
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER NESTLE USA INC FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
230
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
25938001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
230 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
790
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
>prepared a letter report for the CVRWQCB and the County. This letter <br /> >report <br /> >provided the relevant information on the well, the options for <br /> >decommissioning, an evaluation of these options, and a recommended <br /> option <br /> >(use of the shot string method) . After review of this letter report, <br /> the <br /> >agencies approved the recommended method. <br /> >• On Mr. Acharya's return from vacation in late August 2000 and after <br /> >several discussions with Nestle environmental and corporate management <br /> in <br /> >September 2000, it was concluded that the shot string method could <br /> have <br /> >potential risks that might not be acceptable to Nestle and/or the <br /> >homeowners. Thus, Nestle would not approve the method without the <br /> consent <br /> >of the homeowners and arranging an access agreement with them. <br /> >This chronology addresses Mr. Godinez's first question. Regarding the <br /> >actual choice of method, and Nestle's response to Mr. Godinez's <br /> additional <br /> >questions and the concerns raised in Ms. Godinez's e-mail, we would <br /> like to <br /> >discuss these with you in our meeting or conference call. <br /> >We will call you at 11:15 a.m. today, after you have had the <br /> opportunity to <br /> >review this e-mail, to arrange the time and date for a meeting or <br /> >conference <br /> >call. If this is not a convenient time for you and you would like to <br /> >arrange another time, please e-mail or call me at the number below. <br /> >Thank you, <br /> >Robert A. Ellgas, Ph.D. <br /> >Senior Project Manager <br /> >IT Corporation <br /> >4005 Port Chicago Highway <br /> >Concord, CA 94520-1120 <br /> >(925) 288-2101 <br /> >-----Original Message----- <br /> >From: Terry Queirolo [mailto:jennerannQhotmail.com] <br /> >Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 12 :13 PM <br /> >To: Rellgas@theitgroup.com <br /> >Cc: Bill.Godinez®wcom.com <br /> >Subject: Well Closure <br /> >Dear Mr. Rellgas: <br /> >Thank you for your E-Mail sent to my husband October 27, 2000. I see <br /> by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.