Laserfiche WebLink
California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> Alan C.Lloyd,Ph.D.h.D. <br /> Robert Schneider,Chair Arnoldrn <br /> Agency Secretary Sacramento Main Office Schwaraenegger <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive#200,Rancho Cordova,California 95670-6114 Governor <br /> Phone(916)464-3291 •FAX(916)464-4645 �� <br /> http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley G(u1^LLLIIIl CE§V <br /> 29 August 2005 r �� <br /> S' - 7 2005 <br /> ENVIROW <br /> ENT <br /> Mr. Michael Desso PEQ1T1SERVHEASTH <br /> Nestl6 USA, Inc. <br /> 800 North Brand Boulevard <br /> Glendale, California 91203 <br /> FINAL INDOOR AIR VAPOR INTRUSIONRISK EVALUATION, FORMER NESTLE USA, INC. <br /> FACILITY, RIPON, SAN JOA QUIN CO UNTY <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board staff(Regional Board staff) has reviewed the <br /> Final Indoor Air Vapor Intrusion Risk Evaluation (Final Risk Evaluation) received on 23 July 2005. <br /> Regional Board staff comments on the Final Risk Evaluation are provided below. <br /> 1. Regional Board staff concurs with the recommendation to collect vapor samples from buildings near <br /> the Industrial Avenue source area. The specific buildings that Nestle is proposing to sample are not <br /> specifically identified, but the Final Risk Evaluation states that they will be within 100 feet of one of <br /> six sample locations (OB-3-13', OB-5-8', OB-5-23', VE-11, VE-12, or M-6B). These six sample <br /> locations show a potential risk of greater than 1 x 10-6 when evaluated using the EPA's guidance on <br /> assessing potential for vapor intrusion into indoor air. Regional Board staff agrees with sampling <br /> these buildings, but additional buildings beyond 100 feet from one of these sample locations should <br /> be included in the initial phase of sampling. The final confirmation soil vapor data that was <br /> collected in 2001 is very limited and the extent of the soil vapor contamination was not defined <br /> because it was attributed to off-gassing from the groundwater plume. Based on a cursory review of <br /> the known hotspots in the Industrial Avenue area, the buildings immediately south and more than <br /> 100 feet from M-6B hotspot could be at risk because there are no monitoring wells between M-6B <br /> and these buildings and it is difficult to accurately predict how plume concentrations decline with <br /> distance from this groundwater hotspot. Regional Board staff request that Nestle add these buildings <br /> to the proposed sampling program and carefully review the available groundwater/soil vapor data to <br /> determine if other buildings beyond 100 feet from one of the six sample locations warrants inclusion <br /> in the initial phase of sampling. <br /> 2. Regional Board staff does not concur with the conclusion that the pathway is incomplete for the <br /> Stockton Avenue property. The available soil vapor data is not sufficient to draw any conclusions on <br /> residual TCE contamination that may still be present. When the soil vapor extraction (SVE) system <br /> was permanently shut down in 1994, only vapor extraction well VE-8 was sampled to assess the <br /> effectiveness of SVE. While the sample results for VE-8 suggest this well removed VOCs in the <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> C i Recrcied Paper <br />