Laserfiche WebLink
Nestle USA, Inc.—Ripon, CA January 28, 2011 <br /> 2011 Revised Feasibility Study <br /> 2. Not unreasonably affect present and anticipated beneficial use of such <br /> water, and <br /> 3. Not result in water quality less than that prescribed in the Basin Plan and <br /> applicable Water Quality Control Plans and Policies of the State Board. <br /> RWQCB's Basin Plan"" specifies numeric WQOs for the various CDCs. <br /> Chemical-specific regulations, plans and policies which pertain to the Study Area, <br /> include the National Primary Drinking Water Standards developed under the Safe <br /> Drinking Water Act and the State of California Primary Drinking Water Standards. <br /> Primary MCLs address health concerns, while Secondary MCLs address <br /> aesthetics such as taste and odor"x <br /> The National Primary Drinking Water Standards establish health-based MCLs for <br /> chemicals in "community and non-transient, non-community water systems""""' <br /> Similarly, the State Drinking Water Primary Standards (SMCLs) establish water <br /> quality standards for public water systems"""" These regulations pertain to the <br /> Study Area since most of the groundwater has the potential to be (or currently is) <br /> used as a drinking water source. Water supplied to the public cannot contain <br /> COCs exceeding Primary MCLs""""' <br /> MCLs developed by the California Department of Health Services consider <br /> economic factors and technical feasibility. <br /> Other requirements were considered and determined not to pertain to the Study <br /> Area remedial action. For example, the National Secondary Drinking Water <br /> Standards have not been exceeded within the Study Area. MCL Goals (MCLGs) <br /> do not apply, since they either equal the MCL or are zero (only non-zero <br /> chemical-specific standards are typically invoked). Notification of the potentially <br /> harmful on-site CDCs is posted at both treatment systems as per the California <br /> Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65). <br /> 7.2 Action-Specific Requirements <br /> The Federal Clean Water Actxxx'v, as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, <br /> authorizes states to adopt water quality standards""" protective of beneficial uses <br /> of each water body. Each authorized state designates uses for each water body <br /> and establishes anti-degradation requirements. The Federal Clean Water Act <br /> also controls the discharge of chemicals to navigable waters. The National <br /> Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program, 40 CFR Parts 122 to <br /> 125, requires permits for the discharge from any point source to waters of the <br /> United States. Similarly, the State of California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act <br /> (Title 23, Subchapter 9), in addition to protecting the waters of the State <br /> (including groundwater) from degradation, establishes WDRs for point sources. <br /> WDRs may apply to the injection of reagents to groundwater in support of in-situ <br /> remediation technologies. The California Inland Surface Waters Plan"""' <br /> establishes specific concentrations for surface water discharges, for non-ocean <br /> discharges within the State. These requirements may pertain to any remedial <br /> 20 <br />