My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009051
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 2:26:35 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 10:37:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2011 REVISED FEASABILITY STUDY
RECORD_ID
PR0009051
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0000649
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER NESTLE USA INC FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
230
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
25938001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
230 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nestle USA, Inc.—Ripon, CA January 28, 2011 <br /> 2011 Revised Feasibility Study <br /> 9.4.4.1 Effectiveness <br /> The use of local ordinances and institution of property use restrictions are <br /> effective ways to handle or address COCs left in place when other remedial <br /> measures are not possible or if feasible remedial measures do not achieve <br /> acceptable COC concentrations. <br /> 9.4.4.2 Implementability <br /> Beyond federal, state and local ordinances, control. monitoring, and well <br /> installation issues require a focused level of cooperation with these agencies and <br /> other parties. <br /> 9.4.4.3 Relative Cost <br /> The cost for establishing control, monitoring, and well installation restrictions is <br /> dependent on agreements with property owners. Similarly, establishing any <br /> additional ordinances is the responsibility of the City of Ripon and would require <br /> the cooperation of local regulators and community acceptance <br /> 9.4.5 Conclusion <br /> Institutional controls are a viable component of developing remedial alternatives <br /> for the Study Area and therefore are retained for further consideration. <br /> 10 Development and Screening of Alternatives for <br /> Impacted Areas <br /> 10.1 Individual Analysis of Alternatives <br /> Four alternatives developed based on the technologies considered in Section 9 <br /> are further evaluated in this section as overall approaches to addressing COC <br /> impacts across the Study Area. Figure 7 and Table 2 summarize the <br /> development of each of these alternatives. <br /> 10.1.1 Alternative 1 <br /> Alternative 1, the No Action alternative, is used a baseline against which the <br /> other three alternatives are assessed. <br /> 10.1.1.1 Description <br /> The No Action alternative would leave environmental conditions as they are. <br /> Since there are no technologies or activities involved, no time is required for <br /> implementation. The no action alternative assumes that subsurface conditions <br /> as they currently exist are allowed to continue, with current municipal and <br /> agricultural groundwater pumping remaining unchanged from current rates. <br /> 10.1.1.2 Assessment <br /> This alternative provides little protection to human health or the environment. <br /> According to the model output, this scenario would meet RAOs in approximately <br /> 75 years. Long-term and short-term effectiveness is minimal. This alternative is <br /> 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.