Laserfiche WebLink
amec- <br /> 3.5.3 <br /> Potential Mechanism for Historical Elevated TCE in Lower A-Zone Groundwater <br /> Groundwater samples collected early in the project history from monitoring well M-1 A, <br /> approximately 80 feet south of well N-1, were reported to contain relatively high concentrations <br /> of TCE (as high as 10,000 pg/L). Other A-zone wells installed in this area (ED-1, ED-2, EE-1, <br /> EU-1 and EW-1) reportedly had TCE concentrations above 1,000 pg/L. TCE concentrations <br /> rapidly decreased by one to two orders of magnitude in these wells after well N-1 was <br /> decommissioned and groundwater extraction was implemented at EI-1 (Figure 10). This <br /> scenario is consistent with well N-1 acting as a conduit well when idle, with wells N-3 and N-4 <br /> pumping, causing a transient southerly flow away from well N-1 towards wells N-3 and N-4. <br /> However, there is currently no historical information to indicate that this occurred. <br /> 3.6 IMPLICATIONS <br /> The findings and interpretations presented in this Section have the following implications: <br /> • Historical pumping by onsite production wells at annual average rates as high as <br /> 600 gpm would have prevented groundwater movement offsite. Detections of <br /> COCs in samples of offsite groundwater since 1986 are most likely related to offsite <br /> releases because there is no feasible mechanism for groundwater affected by <br /> onsite TCE releases to flow offsite (south, west, or east) during plant operations <br /> because of onsite pumping. The primary conceivable mechanism for dissolved TCE <br /> to leave the Site is by discharge to the industrial sewer. <br /> • Evidence collected to date suggests that releases of TCE (as dissolved solvent but <br /> potentially as pure solvent) in the vicinity of the Decaffeination Building caused <br /> elevated TCE vapors in the vadose zone in this area, and in shallow groundwater <br /> beneath the Decaffeination Building, which was then captured by onsite production <br /> well N-1, and potentially by wells N-3 and N-4. Therefore, future groundwater <br /> remediation efforts should be focused in the area of the former Decaffeination <br /> Building and northward towards the locations of former supply wells N-1 and N-3. <br /> Remediation options for this area are addressed in the Revised Feasibility Study, <br /> submitted to the Water Board on January 30, 2009. This area is currently <br /> addressed with IRAP groundwater extraction wells EU-3 and EU-4, and TCE <br /> concentrations may have declined substantially since the 2005 and 2007 <br /> characterization programs implemented by Geomatrix and ECM. <br /> • The hydrostratigraphy beneath the Site has been revised, where four depth <br /> intervals have been characterized between the water table and base of the Upper <br /> Aquifer at approximately 115 feet bgs as follows: the B-zone (water table to <br /> approximately 40 feet bgs), the Upper A-zone (approximately 50 —80 feet bgs), the <br /> Middle A-zone (approximately 80 — 95 feet bgs), the Lower A-zone (approximately <br /> 100 — 115 feet bgs). <br /> • The area of high TCE concentrations in groundwater is limited to a relatively small <br /> area and shallow depth range (the B-zone and upper portion of the Upper A-zone, <br /> from 40 — 60 feet bgs). This area is addressed in the Revised Feasibility Study, <br /> submitted to the Water Board on January 30, 2009. Concentrations of COCs <br /> AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. <br /> hDoc_Safe\9000s\9837.005\4000 REGULATORY\SCM_01.30.09\1_text\SCM Report Final.doc 24 <br />