My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ACTION; REQUEST FOR STAY HEARING
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KASSON
>
23100
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
0
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ACTION; REQUEST FOR STAY HEARING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 8:01:26 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 1:51:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ACTION; REQUEST FOR STAY HEARING
RECORD_ID
0
PE
2900
FACILITY_NAME
VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM
STREET_NUMBER
23100
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
KASSON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
BANTA
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Therefore, the vroundwater data correlate indirectly(Emphasis Added) with the 1998 and 2008 <br /> discharges on the Valley Pacific Petroleum property". <br /> Groundwater at the site flows predominantly to the northeast. However, some twenty <br /> percent of the time, flow is to the east-southeast, and twenty percent of the time toward the north. <br /> (See EXHIBIT 8, attached and incorporated herein by reference). <br /> Based on recorded groundwater flow, MW43-A has always been up adient of the 1998 <br /> spill located (See EXHIBIT 9, attached and incorporated herein by reference) and the highest <br /> containment level was recorded in 2006,prior to the 2008 spill (See EXHIBIT 10, attached and <br /> incorporated herein by reference). Therefore,the groundwater data from this well do not <br /> correlate at all with either spill. <br /> MW46-A is generally downgradient of the 1998 spill. However, this well is immediately <br /> downgradient of the`Excavation Area 3" (See EXHIBIT 9, attached and incorporated herein by <br /> reference) which was excavated by Chevron in 2004 because of diesel contaminated soil related <br /> to their own keylock operation. Moreover, monitoring wells MW9, and MW20, which were <br /> located within Excavation Area 3 and have been destroyed, had detected diesel in the <br /> groundwater as early as 1991 and 1995, respectively, predating both the 1998 and the 2008 spills <br /> (See EXHIBIT 10, attached and incorporated herein by reference). Therefore, the groundwater <br /> data from MW46-A do not correlate at all with either spill. <br /> Issue#5: <br /> The Order further improperly states: "Monitoring well W-63A on Chevron's property is <br /> closer to Chevron's documented release areas but has concentrations of TPHd that are lower <br /> than the monitoring wells adjacent to Valley Pacific Petroleum's property where the 1998 and <br /> 2008 spills occurred. This indicates that the source of TPHd observed in MW-43A and MW-46A <br /> is more likely the Valley Pacific Petroleum property (Emphasis Added). " <br /> As stated above,MW43-A is upgradient of the 1998 spill and the highest levels of diesel <br /> occurred prior to the 2008 spill. As stated above, MW46-A is immediately downgradient of a <br /> Chevron release area. MW63-A is a well that shows anomalously low levels of TPHd, perhaps <br /> due to its proximity to a stormwater retention pond. A better comparison would be made <br /> between wells MW34-UA and MW35-UA, both of which are in a Chevron release area and well <br /> cluster MW74-UA, MW74-A, and MW74-B, which are in the closest proximity to the 1998 spill, <br /> As shown in EXHIBIT 10 (attached and incorporated herein by reference), 2009 and 2011 <br /> average concentrations of diesel in MW34-A and MW35-A are higher than those in the MW74 <br /> .series. <br /> 5. Petitioner is Aggrieved: <br /> Petitioner is aggrieved for the reasons set forth in Paragraph 4 above. Petitioner is further <br /> Petition for Review/Request for Hearing <br /> -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.