My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003115
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0011521
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 8:21:19 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 2:03:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003115
RECORD_ID
PR0011521
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0004003
FACILITY_NAME
MOHR-FRY RANCHES
STREET_NUMBER
950
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17728052
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
950 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mohr-Fry Ranches <br /> 950 Industrial Drive, Stockton, California May 30, 1996 <br /> • Bioremediation Report page; 3 <br />' 3.1 Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples were taken in 1" by 6" brass sleeves from relatively undisturbed,soil <br />' Samples were collected from within the treatment cell with a hand operated drive <br /> hammer spoon sampler All soil sampling equipment was thoroughly washed with <br /> tnsodium phosphate and then rinsed thoroughly before and between sampling to <br />' prevent cross contamination The soil samples did not have head space and were <br /> immediately sealed in their Inners using aluminum foil lined plastic caps The <br /> samples were then sealed in air-tight plastic bags and immediately placed in an ice <br />' chest cooled with Blue Ice® All samples were then transported with appropriate <br /> chain of custody documents to California Laboratory Services, a State-certified <br /> laboratory located in Rancho Cordova, California Sampling was witnessed by Mr <br />' Steve Sasson representing the San Joaquin County PHS/EHD on November 11, <br /> 1995 <br /> 3.2 Requested Analysis <br /> Soil samples were analyzed using EPA method 3550 LLFT for Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons as Diesel, Motor Oil, and Gasoline, and EPA method 8020 for <br /> Benzene, Toluene, Xylene and Ethyl Benzene (Table 1, Table 2, & Appendix A) <br /> I3.3 Analytical Findings <br /> All samples tested "ND", None Detected, for Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, <br /> Xylene and Gasoline (Table 1, Table 2, and Appendix A) Diesel and Motor Oil <br /> contaminants were detected in many of the soil samples (Table 1 and 2) <br /> However, these detection and/or levels are below the 1,000 mg/kg level identified <br /> in the LUFT assessment found in Appendix B of this report All sample locations <br /> are identified in Figure 3 Analytical data with chain of custody records can be <br /> Ireferenced in Appendix A- <br /> 4.0 Conclusions do Recommendations <br /> All contaminated soil from the remedial excavations was treated for a duration of twelve <br /> months The volatile aromatic compounds (BTX&E) have since been removed (Table 1 <br /> & Appendix A) coupled with the levels of Diesel and Motor Oil being significantly <br /> diminished (Table 2 & Appendix A) Satisfactory action was taken under a different <br /> contract to mitigate the acetone previously released from the two 8,000 gallon tanks <br />., (Section 2 0 of this report) Contamination, associated with the groundwater, has not <br /> been detected in any of the last four(4) quarterly groundwater monitoring events <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.