My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HUNTER
>
130
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505148
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2020 4:32:48 PM
Creation date
2/5/2020 2:48:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0505148
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0003950
FACILITY_NAME
SJ COUNTY GARAGE
STREET_NUMBER
130
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
HUNTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
130 N HUNTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N <br /> San Joaquin County Sites <br /> Page 2 <br /> sections should be prepared by your consultant to identify potential or likely contaminant <br /> migration pathways. EDB should be added to the suite of analytes being tested for in <br /> the groundwater samples <br /> 145 S. SUTTER, STOCKTON (HUMAN SERVICES) <br /> The Corrective Action Plan submitted in January 1998 recommended Intrinsic <br /> Remediation with Monitoring as the appropriate corrective action for this site. <br /> Groundwater monitoring and sampling is ongoing and the concentrations of <br /> contaminants in the source area have not declined to a level that would indicate the site <br /> should be closed . In addition , the vertical extent of the groundwater contamination in the <br /> source area has not been defined . Reviews of the plan were to be conducted at five- <br /> year intervals and there has been no review of the plan. Your consultant should review <br /> the mass of contaminants remaining at the site and determine if active remediation can <br /> be performed or if site closure leaving the remaining mass in place can be justified . <br /> 503 E. TENTH, TRACY <br /> The contamination at this site appears to be defined . Monitoring and sampling of the <br /> groundwater has not been conducted since February 1999 . Two quarterly monitoring <br /> events should be conducted and the mass of the contamination remaining should be <br /> calculated . If the analytical results of the groundwater samples from the monitoring wells <br /> are non detect at appropriate detection limits and the mass calculation shows the water <br /> is unlikely to be impacted in the future then a closure report for the site shouldbe <br /> prepared . EDB should be added to the suite of analytes being tested for in the <br /> groundwater samples. <br /> 392 S. MOFFAT, MANTECA <br /> This site is currently performing routine quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling . <br /> The work plan to continue the investigation of the vertical and lateral extent of the <br /> contamination approved by EHD in June 2003 should be implemented. A site <br /> conceptual model and/or cross section should be prepared by your consultant to identify <br /> likely contaminant migration pathways . EDB should be added to the suite of analytes <br /> being tested for in the groundwater samples <br /> 222 E. WEBER, STOCKTON <br /> There is a sand lens at 35 feet below grade (bsg) at this site that may be a migratory <br /> pathway for the MTBE contamination . It was discussed that placement of soil borings <br /> up-gradient (southwest) and cross-gradient (southeast) of MW1 and obtaining soil <br /> samples and grab water samples from 35 feet bsg may provide definition for the site. If <br /> those samples are non detect then the site should be evaluated to see if further <br /> investigation is needed. <br /> 130 N. HUNTER, STOCKTON <br /> Groundwater monitoring wells were installed in July 2002 and were destroyed in <br /> February 2005 because the City of Stockton purchased the site and are having a parking <br /> garage constructed . Monitoring wells will be installed following completion of <br /> construction activities at the site. The contamination remains undefined . The City of <br /> Stockton has taken over as the active responsible party for the site investigation as <br /> stated in the purchase agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.