Laserfiche WebLink
d <br /> 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION <br /> On behalf of the San Joaquin County Facilities Management Department, Ramage Environmental <br /> has prepared this Work Plan, Additional Site Investigation for submittal to San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Division (EHD) and to the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board (RWQCB . EHD verbally requested this work plan on February 13 , 2004 . This document <br /> also includes the groundwater monitoring results for the Fourth Quarter 2003 . <br /> 1 . 1 Site Location and Description <br /> The subject site is an active single-level parking garage located at 130 N . Hunter Street in <br /> Stockton , California (Figure 1 ) . Two former gasoline underground storage tanks (UST) existed <br /> under the sidewalk, adjacent to the west side of the garage building , and two former gasoline <br /> dispensers on a single island existed approximately 20 feet inside the building (Figure 2) . <br /> 1 .2 Previous Work <br /> 1 . 2. 1 Initial Soil Borings <br /> In May 1994 , Kleinfelder drilled two soil borings (designated B- 1 and B-2) at the south ends of <br /> each UST (Figure 2) . Kleinfelder documented the results of the investigation in Environmental <br /> and Geotechnical Assessment Report and Tank Removal Plan, dated August 26 , 1994 . <br /> Both soil borings were drilled to total depths of approximately 25 feet below ground surface (bgs) . <br /> Based on field screening with a photoionization detector (PID) , only the soil sample with the <br /> highest organic vapor concentration from each boring was submitted for laboratory analysis. The <br /> soil sample collected at 20 feet from B- 1 contained 290 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of Total <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)-as-gasoline , 4 . 7 mg/kg of ethylbenzene, and 8 . 0 mg/kg of <br /> xylenes. The soil sample collected at 18 feet from B-2 contained 250 mg/kg of TPH-as-gasoline, <br /> 1 .7 mg/kg of ethylbenzene, and 7. 0 mg/kg of xylenes. The soil samples from the bottom of the <br /> boreholes were not submitted for laboratory analysis . Groundwater was not encountered during <br /> the investigation . The soil sample analytical results are summarized in Table 1 . <br /> I � <br /> 4 <br /> it <br /> I <br />