Laserfiche WebLink
23 August 2005 <br /> Rodney Schatz <br /> 1. The January and February 2005 monitoring reports indicate dissolved oxygen concentrations were <br /> possessed inadequate dissolved oxygen. In both months, <br /> below 1.0 mg/L. Discharge Specification B.6 requires the <br /> dissolved <br /> id indicate gen concentration <br /> inadenc ntration is <br /> o be <br /> at least 1.0 mg/L. Inadequate dissolved oxygen concentrations <br /> available in the pond. The Discharger's 7 June 2005 response oRtpro Regional <br /> llb required red an August <br /> 2004 Notice of Violation (NOV) confirmed this condition. <br /> analysis of the need for pond aeration and installation of <br /> needed <br /> d aeration <br /> era i was not by I September <br /> pt mber 2004. <br /> This requirement was restated in the NOV. This schedule requirement <br /> 2. The wastewater pond possessed inadequate freeboard in February005. Discharge <br /> Spmayfication <br /> B.13 requires a minimum of two feet of freeboard at all times. Inadequate <br /> nal <br /> indicate that the pond is too small. The Discharger' rid is too June 0small 05 sDischargponse to e Specification <br /> Board's 30 August 2004 NOV confirmed that the pondfl <br /> B.14 requires the wastewater system to have sufficient capacity fors accommodate <br /> n of astew t improvements, <br /> w <br /> and precipitation. WDR Provision G.Lb required a scheduleion of <br /> which has not been received. Discharge of wastewater from ivil Liallling bilitythe pond is a(ACL) amounts may be <br /> the WDRs and stormwater requirements. Administrative <br /> imposed at the rate of$10 per gallon of wastewater/stormwater mixtures spilled. <br /> 3. Mokelumne Rim Winery has not complied with the groundwater well i or 1 aing eon in of the <br /> WDRs. Staff has commented on workplans for the groundwater <br /> correspondence dated 27 August 2004 and 5 May 2005• date,To staff <br /> has to be of recei d no laterl <br /> workplan that can be approved. WDRs Provision G.IS re qu <br /> than 15 September 2004, but the wells have not been installed and the installation is nearly a year <br /> overdue. <br /> Technical Reports Required by the WDRs <br /> Mokelumne Rim has submitted incomplete technical reports h issues have been ias fai ed to t re f edthat are <br /> required by the Provisions section of the WDRs. The following <br /> I. WDRs Provision G.Lb required submittal of a Water <br /> Balance <br /> that rt Treatment <br /> upon.uate in The <br /> original submittal was dated 24 June 2004; staff Yis still <br /> 30 August 2004 NOV. A revised report was submitted <br /> of improv0e05,but ments.1 In addition,on, staff inadequate <br /> because it failed to include a schedule for implementation <br /> has serious concerns about the approach to provide aerrattioon�t b thl pond.June 2004. To Provdateision <br /> a G.Lb <br /> required submittal of a Water Balance and Treatment p Y <br /> complete report has not been received. <br /> 2. WDRs Provision G.1.c required submittal of aGroundwater Well Installation been submitted three <br /> kplan; an <br /> adequate workplan has not been submitted. Versions of the workplan have <br /> times (28 June 2004, 14 March 2005, and 23 May 2005);005 h of the July plans were granteg of the <br /> conditional approvals by staff(27 August 2004, 5 May <br /> workplans have been complete or satisfactorily add reset stWorkp an and a`GT r�Doundwavi ion <br /> G.Lc required submittal of a Groundwater Well Ins <br /> tallation Sampling and Analysis Workplan. To date,the workplans have not been received. <br /> W:\Smff\ObricunSan JoaquinWokelumne Rim Vinevards\Schalz 2 Aug 05.doc <br />