Laserfiche WebLink
' The destruction efficiencies for July 26, August 31, and October 7, 2005 were also calculated using PID <br /> readings which resulted in 95 45 percent, 96 28 percent, and 95 37 percent, respectively Destruction <br /> efficiency calculations are provided in Table 7 <br /> ' Since the destruction efficient calculations for most of the analytes using laboratory data were below 99% <br /> Y Yt g ►y <br /> ATC also calculated the total mass of TPHg and BTEX during the reporting period to show compliance <br /> ' with the site San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District(APCD)permit The total mass released was <br /> calculated using the average effluent stream concentrations and influent flow rate which resulted in a total <br /> mass of 5 23 pounds emitted by the SVE system from July 1 to October 7,2005 into ambient air This value <br /> is below the allowable 2 3 pounds per day of VOC's stated in the APCD permit Emissions calculations are <br /> provided in Table 8 <br /> Water Treatment System Evaluation <br /> From June 29 to October 7, 2005, the average groundwater extraction rate from the vapor extraction <br /> ' system knockout tank was approximately 35 07 gallons per hour of operation and the total groundwater <br /> discharged to the City of Stockton sewer system was approximately 50,348 gallons <br /> ' Approximately 50,348 gallons of groundwater were extracted from VWI, VW2, and MW1 and the <br /> average influent concentrations of TPHg, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes from June 29 <br /> to October 7, 2005, were below the stated laboratory method detection limits of 50 ug/l, 0 5 ug/l, 0 5 ug/l, <br /> ' 0 5 ug/l, and 1 0 ug/l, respectively The petroleum hydrocarbons in the extracted groundwater appear to <br /> be volatilizing and are being remediated by the thermal oxidizer and absorbed by the in series carbon <br /> vessels located within the remediation compound <br /> Calculations for the masses of TPHg, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and MTBE removed during <br /> the third quarter 2005 reporting period are provided in Table 9 <br /> Total TPHg removed via groundwater treatment and discharge since system startup on December 19,2002 <br /> 10 11 pounds of TPHg as of end of second quarter 2005 + 0 02 pounds of TPHg during the third <br /> ' quarter 2005 = 10 13 pounds of TPHg removed since the startup of the system <br /> Based on the low concentrations of the remaining target analytes detected from the influent sample port, <br /> the total mass BTEX treated and removed from the groundwater treatment system were calculated but not <br /> included in the cumulative removal volumes These values were calculated for each analyte for the current <br /> quarter, however, a cumulative total has not historically been calculated for each analyte since remediation <br /> ' began at the site <br /> Air Sparge System Evaluation <br /> ' From June 29 to October 7, 2005, the air sparge system operated continuously The average air injection <br /> rate from June 29 to October 7, 2005 was approximately 15 84 SCFM and the average influent pressure was <br /> ' approximately 3 8 pounds per square inch(PSI) <br /> s lenviro1625961quart1yl3gr-2005 doc ATC ASSOCIATES INC <br />