Laserfiche WebLink
URS <br /> Page 7 <br /> Ms Margaret Lagorlo <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> June 27, 2003 <br /> 2002 UST Removal <br /> One split (10,000-gallon and 12,00-gallon) gasoline UST and one 20,000-gallon gasoline UST were <br /> removed from the site on October 22, 2002 <br /> USTs appeared tobe mgoocondition,00 The associated ing nid excavated with no apparent <br /> spensers had been previously <br /> removed on August 15, 2002 The <br /> holes or cracks noted during the removal activities (URS,2002) <br /> Six soil samples were collected from the bottom of the UST pit at the north, center, and south portions <br /> of each former UST location The tank pit was approximately 18 feet bgs The tank samples were <br /> collected by pushing a brass tube into a fresh backhoe bucket of soil One soil sample was collected <br /> beneath each of the four dispensers Three soil samples were collected beneath the product lines at <br /> llected <br /> approximately 5 feet bgs The dispenser collect d from gsampls he one-site ere so 1 ostockpilesiThe long <br /> at or de ofetheFso 1 <br /> ur <br /> composite soil samples were also <br /> samples is shown in the figure in Attachment H <br /> Soil samples were analyzed for TPHg by U S EPA Method 8015, BTEX, and MtBE by EPA Method <br /> 8021, and fuel oxygenates (TBA, MtBE, DIPE, TAME, ETBE, EDB, and 1,2-DCA) by EPA Method <br /> 8260B Soil stockpile samples were also analyzed for total lead by EPA Method 6000/7000 Series <br /> Methods <br /> No analytes were detected at or above reporting limits in the seven soil samples collected from below the <br /> dispenser islands and the piping No analytes were detected at or above reporting limits in the six soil <br /> of <br /> th the exception <br /> samples collected from the bottom he results of confirmation soil samples ples are presented in At chme t which Has <br /> reported at 16 mg/kg in PB <br /> Because impacted soil was not observed in the UST excavation and stockpile sample results did not <br /> identify analytes at or above reporting limits,the excavated soil was used to backfill the tank pit <br /> SOIL IMPACTS SUMMARY <br /> As of October 2002, all USTs,piping, and dispensers have been removed from the site During the 1999 <br /> UST upgrade, impacted soils identified in the tank pit were overexcavated to allow for installation of <br /> new tanks Only low levels of fuel-related constituents have been identified in the soil remaining at the <br /> site TPHg was reported at concentrations up to 1,170 mg/kg at 5 feet bgs (although the 6-foot bgs <br /> sample was below reporting limits), ethylbenzene was reported in one sample at 0 00632 mg/kg, xylenes <br /> were detected at a maximum of 19 3 mg/kg, and MtBE was detected up to 0 560 mg/kg to a 4-foot bgs <br /> the method <br /> on <br /> removal <br /> sample No benzene or toluene <br /> detect anydetected <br /> constituent aat or boore above the methodidetect�on hmik with the <br /> activities from 2002 did no <br /> exception of one TBA detection (1 6 mg/kg at 18 feet bgs) <br /> K 1WprocessV5 BP ARC0100434\Closure RequesAStatton 434 Closure Doc doc <br />