My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KLO
>
146
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0517686
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2020 6:25:38 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 4:49:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0517686
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0013549
FACILITY_NAME
CENTRAL VALLEY CONSTRUCTION INC
STREET_NUMBER
146
STREET_NAME
KLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
146 KLO RD
P_LOCATION
07
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The UST were two 10,000 gallon and one 1,000 gallon gasoline tanks, as well as a 1,000 <br /> gallon diesel tank. <br /> The four.UST were removed by TELIC Engineering on August 1, 1989. No soil or water <br /> samples were taken at the time of removal. William Snavely, in his inspection report stated <br /> that no samples were collected, however he noted that " samples to be taken under permit <br /> required with Environmental Health. Contractor to submit closure plan and pay fees at the <br /> rate of $90.00 per tank." <br /> GEOLOGICAL TECHNICS, INC., in a workplan dated September 1998 reports that there was <br /> some soil contamination and possible groundwater contamination from both the UST and from <br /> an Above Ground 10,000 gallon gasoline Tank (AST). They further stated that the domestic <br /> well was possibly contaminated with fuel products. <br /> JPCA tested the domestic well on January 10, 2001. No detectable contaminants were <br /> identified from this sampling event. <br /> The former UST area was identified by Tony Mocetti, a local contractor, who had worked on <br /> the property when the UST and AST were removed from the site. His information on the <br /> location for the AST and UST locations were confirmed by aerial photographs of the site. <br /> At approximately 15 feet below grade a moist, sandy, grey black lens was encountered. The <br /> PID reading ranged from 28 - 40 PPM. One soil sample was collected from this sandy lens. <br /> Two other soil samples were also taken in the former UST area. On April 27, 2001, John P. <br /> Cummings of JPCA took samples of soil and water from the subject property. <br /> Groundwater was encountered at approximately 18 feet. A clean bailer was used to collect the <br /> groundwater sample. <br /> The domestic well was purged and one water sample collected and analyzed. <br /> The soil, groundwater and domestic water samples collected were analyzed for Total <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPHG); Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xvlene <br /> (BTEX); and Oxygenates. <br /> No contamination was detected in the Potable Well water analysis. Very low concentration <br /> were observed in the soil and groundwater analysis. <br /> Under Permit from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District <br /> (SJVUAPCD), approximately 200 yds' of soil were excavated from the former UST and AST <br /> areas and aerated on site with the excavation commencing on August 22, 2001. <br /> After several weeks of aeration, no TPHG and BTEX was detected in the aerated soil. <br /> On November 5, 2001, three monitoring wells were constructed on site under the proper <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.