Laserfiche WebLink
Gaitan, Jason <br /> From: ehscompliance@yahoo.com <br /> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 11:13 AM <br /> To: Gaitan, Jason <br /> Cc: Dale Sandhu <br /> Subject: Re: RIG MASTER RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS <br /> Good Morning Jason, <br /> It was the intent of Mr. Singh to operate within the SQG regulatory requirements. Based on his past <br /> waste generation quantities operation above the LQG 1000 kg/month threshold limits may have been <br /> an episodic event. <br /> The former tanks used for storage of antifreeze and used oil may again be used for such purpose by <br /> Mr. Singh or others. Cleaning the tanks at this point would perhaps require a treatment permit for <br /> tank washing and also generate unnecessary additional waste which must be properly disposed. It is <br /> Mr. Singh's intent to comply with the regulatory requirements, and also minimize his waste <br /> production consistent with the overall spirit of H&S Code, Chapter 6.5. <br /> Based on possible future use of the tanks for the same purpose and added waste generation, it is not <br /> prudent to wash them at this time. Thanks for your consideration in closing the remaining violation. <br /> Joe <br /> Joe Canas, CSP <br /> Advanced EH&S Concepts <br /> (661) 703-3281 <br /> On Wednesday, March 4, 2020, 08:55:36 AM PST, Gaitan, Jason <jgaitan@sjgov.org> wrote: <br /> Hi Joe, <br /> have reviewed information and closed the following violations: 102, 114, 118, 403, 507, and 605. <br /> Violation 502 remains open I need an additional response/documents. Can you provide a manifest for the <br /> removal of contents in the waste antifreeze tank and used oil tank. <br /> REGULATION GUIDANCE: <br /> Title 22 California Code of Regulations (CCR) section 66262.34(a)(1)(A) <br /> 1 <br />