Laserfiche WebLink
FROM : D.M.STAUDENRAUS PHONE NO. : 415 788 6099 JUN. 25 1997 02,21PM P2 <br /> %"we <br /> DOLORES M. STAUDIENRAUS <br /> MONTGOMERY WASHINGTON TWR SUITE 2305 <br /> 611 WASHINGTON STREET <br /> SAN FRANCISCO, CAUroRNIA 94111 <br /> PWOWE (4141768*6096 <br /> 24 June 1997 <br /> Michael Infurna <br /> pHS/EuD - San Joaquin County <br /> P.O. Box 388 <br /> StacXton, CA 95201 <br /> RE. Remediation Project: 305 S. Hutchins, Lodi <br /> Dear Mike; <br /> Tlyt reviewed the copy of Mr. Moser's June 17th letter that you provided me <br /> and wish to cornent asfollows. It should be noted the letter presses for <br /> Site closure in advance of an immanent court imposed deadline. To assure this <br /> Texaco agrees to terms that include a plan for well maintanence and monitorinx- <br /> h <br /> It seems implicit it ext of that letter, as well as the terms, that Texaco's <br /> responsibilities are limited to accommodating other parties in their efforts to <br /> address a problem which, Texaco asserts, arise off site. TexavO-s responsibil- <br /> ities are constrained by time and unaffected by eventualities. <br /> The underlying assumption of the agreement must,then, be that there is concen- <br /> sus by all parties of interest that the Site itself has not contributed to the <br /> problem for which tbQ wells are to be retained. That assumption can't be re- <br /> conciled with the DISC letter of 2128/97 which states: "The Site has been deter- <br /> mined as a source for the I,2-DCA and other VOC's detected in soils and ground- <br /> water beneath the Site by DTSC." <br /> Further, the following statement taken from Mr. Moser's letter of 1/10/97 to the <br /> SWRCS misrepresents the position of the TRC in this regard. "The TING analyzed <br /> this issue at length and concluded that the 1,2-DCA in the groundwater beneath <br /> the Site is associated with degradation of PCE and TCE in the regional Lodi <br /> solvent plume, a plume which originates upgradient of the Site and which is shown <br /> on DISC maps to have 'reached the Site." The position of the TRC. as represented <br /> in the County's letter of 12/13/96 to S'WRCS is as follows: ..The only constit- <br /> uent the CVRVQCS is concerned with is 1,2-DCA. The TRC discussed the existence <br /> and levels of 1,2-]DCA in the groundwater extensively and concluded the 1.2-DCA <br /> is associated with the degradation of PCE and TCE as well as a past additive to <br /> gasoline.*# "Even if I,Z-DCA Is found in the soil at the Site, the source of <br /> the 1,2-DCA in the rroundwater may be the breakdown of the PCE and TCE." <br /> It would appear Mr. Moser seeks to establish Texaco as an innocent party in these <br /> matters simply by agreeing to terms that inherently infer this to be so. If I <br /> am in error on this , please advise me <br /> Request the Opportunity to review a draft of the closure letter prior to issue. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ok�__ <br />