My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003169
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HUTCHINS
>
305
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545307
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003169
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 10:11:39 AM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:04:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003169
RECORD_ID
PR0545307
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000932
FACILITY_NAME
DOMINO'S #8588
STREET_NUMBER
305
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HUTCHINS
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
03319020
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
305 S HUTCHINS ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While groundwater samples from developed wells MW-1 and MW-3 <br /> were free of TPH-D and HVOs, TPH-G and BTEX were present. The <br /> similar concentrations of these contaminants ( 780-910 ppb TPH-G <br /> and 6 . 8-8.2 ppb benzene) may indicate a uniform distribution <br /> of these contaminants across much of the site. No contaminants <br /> were detected in the groundwater sample from MW-2 . <br /> Given the high concentrations of TPH-G and TPH-D detected in <br /> soil within borings EB-8 and EB-11 , and in consideration of <br /> ' the porosities of sands encountered at the site ( see Appendix <br /> A- soil boring logs ) , Uriah proposes the following: <br /> 1 ) The installation of two additional soil borings at <br /> the locations specified in Figure 2. These will be <br /> installed and sampled in the same manner as previous <br /> borings . <br /> 2 ) On-site testing of soil vapor extraction (SVE) tech- <br /> nology, the probable remediation technology of choice. <br /> An overview of SVE technology is presented below. <br /> Soil Vapor Extraction and Bioventing Technology Overview <br /> Soil Vapor Extraction ( SVE) of organic contaminants in vadose <br /> soils is a process that embraces the principle that many anthro- <br /> pogenic organic hydrocarbons, including those which comprise <br /> gasoline, will volatilize at ambient soil temperatures. Upon <br /> partitioning from the liquid to the gaseous phase, these <br />' contaminants will enter the pore spaces between soil particles <br /> until an equilibrium is achieved. This partitioning is described <br /> by Raoult ' s Law. Partitioning into the vapor phase is determined <br /> by the volatility of a contaminant, its solubility in water, <br />' and the degree to which it will adsorb to soil and other <br /> particulate matter. Henry ' s Law and vapor pressure are used <br /> to determine appropriate volatility for SVE. Henry ' s Law <br /> constants above 0 .01 (dimensionless ) tend to move from aqueous <br /> to gaseous phase. Contaminants with vapor pressures greater <br /> than 25 mm/Hg are generally considered as good candidates for <br /> SVE, with vapor pressures as low as 1 mm/Hg acceptable. The <br /> vapor pressure of gasoline is between 37 and 260 mm/Hg depending <br /> upon the degree of weathering (degradation) . <br /> The solubility of gasoline is appropriate to SVE parameters <br /> and, while gasoline may adsorb onto soil and other (organic) <br /> particles within the soil matrix, sorption is generally not <br /> 1 so strong as to preclude efficient SVE remediation. In fact, <br /> 2-5% water vapor is considered necessary to avoid drying of <br /> the soil which would lead to a reduction in contaminant vapor <br /> extraction efficiency. <br /> 8. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.