My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003153
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
212
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545309
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 9:49:58 PM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:20:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003153
RECORD_ID
PR0545309
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010339
FACILITY_NAME
H&H ENGINEERING CONST INC
STREET_NUMBER
212
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206-3920
APN
17728019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
212 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
kn K L E I N F E L D E R <br /> 40 • Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons as referenced to Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA Method <br /> 8015/8021B <br /> The samples were analyzed on a standard laboratory turnaround schedule requiring <br /> approximately 10 working days <br /> For a summary of the results of the chemical analyses conducted, please refer to the attached <br /> Table 1 <br /> 3.0 FINDINGS <br /> The groundwater flow direction was calculated to be towards the northeast with a gradient of <br /> approximately 0 0058 ft/ft (see Plate 3) during the July 3, 2002 sampling event Previous <br /> groundwater flow directions between October 1998 and July 2000 have historically been to the <br /> northeast however, in December 2000 and December 2001, groundwater flow direction was <br /> calculated to the east and east/southeast, respectively Groundwater gradients have ranged from <br /> 0004 to 0010 ft /ft <br /> Although no measurable product or sheen was noted, a petroleum-like odor was noted from <br /> purge water in monitoring well MW-1 No unusual odor was noted in monitoring wells MW-2 <br /> and MW-3 <br /> . TPH-G and BTEX constituents were detected in one or more groundwater samples collected <br /> from the three wells during the sampling event The analytical results are summarized on the <br /> attached Table 1 <br /> TPH-G was detected in groundwater from each of the three wells at concentrations ranging from <br /> 30 to 380 µg/l (parts per billion) BTEX constituents were detected primarily in MW-1 Benzene <br /> was detected at 134 µg/1 in MW-1 and at 70 µg/1 in MW-3 Ethylbenzene was detected only In <br /> MW-1 at 6 8 µg/l Toluene and total xylenes were not detected at or above laboratory reporting <br /> limits In the three-groundwater samples r <br /> The sampling event shows an overall decrease in petroleum constituent concentrations as <br /> compared to the previous December 2001 sampling event Based upon this data it appears that <br /> the overall petroleum constituents in the contaminant plume have decreased <br /> For a review of historical laboratory analyses conducted, refer to Table 1 Copies of the <br /> laboratory data sheets along with the laboratory reporting limits are presented In Attachment C <br /> Kletnfelder recommends that a copy of this report be submitted to the San Joaquin County Public <br /> Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) for their review and comment if <br /> necessary <br /> i <br /> 20-4439-01 E04/ST02R397 Page 4 of 6 <br /> Copyright 2002,K1einfelder,Inc August 22,2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.