Laserfiche WebLink
kn K L E I N F E L D E R <br /> 40 • Total Purgeable Petroleum Hydrocarbons as referenced to Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA Method <br /> 8015/8021B <br /> The samples were analyzed on a standard laboratory turnaround schedule requiring <br /> approximately 10 working days <br /> For a summary of the results of the chemical analyses conducted, please refer to the attached <br /> Table 1 <br /> 3.0 FINDINGS <br /> The groundwater flow direction was calculated to be towards the northeast with a gradient of <br /> approximately 0 0058 ft/ft (see Plate 3) during the July 3, 2002 sampling event Previous <br /> groundwater flow directions between October 1998 and July 2000 have historically been to the <br /> northeast however, in December 2000 and December 2001, groundwater flow direction was <br /> calculated to the east and east/southeast, respectively Groundwater gradients have ranged from <br /> 0004 to 0010 ft /ft <br /> Although no measurable product or sheen was noted, a petroleum-like odor was noted from <br /> purge water in monitoring well MW-1 No unusual odor was noted in monitoring wells MW-2 <br /> and MW-3 <br /> . TPH-G and BTEX constituents were detected in one or more groundwater samples collected <br /> from the three wells during the sampling event The analytical results are summarized on the <br /> attached Table 1 <br /> TPH-G was detected in groundwater from each of the three wells at concentrations ranging from <br /> 30 to 380 µg/l (parts per billion) BTEX constituents were detected primarily in MW-1 Benzene <br /> was detected at 134 µg/1 in MW-1 and at 70 µg/1 in MW-3 Ethylbenzene was detected only In <br /> MW-1 at 6 8 µg/l Toluene and total xylenes were not detected at or above laboratory reporting <br /> limits In the three-groundwater samples r <br /> The sampling event shows an overall decrease in petroleum constituent concentrations as <br /> compared to the previous December 2001 sampling event Based upon this data it appears that <br /> the overall petroleum constituents in the contaminant plume have decreased <br /> For a review of historical laboratory analyses conducted, refer to Table 1 Copies of the <br /> laboratory data sheets along with the laboratory reporting limits are presented In Attachment C <br /> Kletnfelder recommends that a copy of this report be submitted to the San Joaquin County Public <br /> Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) for their review and comment if <br /> necessary <br /> i <br /> 20-4439-01 E04/ST02R397 Page 4 of 6 <br /> Copyright 2002,K1einfelder,Inc August 22,2002 <br />