My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JACKSON
>
1702
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545315
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 12:05:30 PM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:46:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545315
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003572
FACILITY_NAME
DAVES UNION SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
1702
STREET_NAME
JACKSON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
APN
227-14-011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1702 JACKSON ST
P_LOCATION
06
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JOHN LANE <br /> PAGE 2 <br /> cubic feet per minute. This flow rate, along with a vacuum of 30 inches of water applied at the well <br /> head, was recommended to effect the radius of influence specified in the corrective action plan. The <br /> flow rates being reported for the system at this site, if correct, are considerably below this design <br /> specification. In addition, the vacuum being applied at the well heads are also considerably lower than <br /> what was indicated for the design. <br /> Please explain the discrepancy between the original design parameters and the actual operating <br /> values of the vapor extraction system. Please include all calculations used to design the <br /> system, especially those calculations used to determine the flow restrictions through the <br /> elbows and tees and over the length of the pipes. Specifically, PHSIEHD is interested in the <br /> data used by Clearwater to determine the size and configuration of the piping and the size of <br /> the vacuum pump. <br /> The tables in Appendix C showing the values and the formula for calculating recovered hydrocarbons <br /> are difficult to interpret and follow. It is uncertain whether the flow rates used in the calculations are <br /> correct. In addition, although the actual values are small, the concentrations reported in the second <br /> table on the first page are all zero. Using these reported values, the result of the calculations would <br /> also be zero. Because time for review is limited, please submit to PHS/EHD complete <br /> calculations in a format that can be easily read and duplicated. <br /> PHSIEHD has reviewed the letter proposing to measure biogenic gasses at this site. As PHSIEHD has <br /> not yet had the opportunity to effectively review any representative data from the site, the <br /> implementation of this proposal would be premature at this time. In addition, this type of information is <br /> estimative and assumptive, and would unlikely be useful at this site, given the almost ideal conditions <br /> for soil vapor extraction. <br /> Please provide all the above noted submittals to PHSIEHD by June 30, 1995. If you have any <br /> questions or wish to discuss this letter in more detail, please contact Linda Turkatte, Senior REHS, at <br /> (209) 468-3441. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 4 A& ' VJV,_� 1% <br /> Linda Turkatte, Senior REHS Diane M. Hinson, REHS <br /> Site Mitigation Unit Supervisor <br /> c: CVRWQCB, Beth Thayer <br /> c: SWRCB Cleanup Fund, George Lockewood <br /> C.* Margaret Ekholm <br /> c: David Wood <br /> c: Neumiller and Beardslee, Brooke Birke <br /> C.' Clearwater Group, Juniper Neill <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.