Laserfiche WebLink
i ,4 f • � --] ,�. lam• � F � `'y a _� r Y"l <br /> LEARWATER <br /> E — G. R 6.-U-U P I. N C. _s k <br /> d. <br /> F <br /> Recent monitoring ;reports submitted ta; .your attention'."showed. t'haf the <br /> ' appllcation�,of•vacuum 'Wt —fhese `wells',.was not generating Y an .increase in <br /> hydrocarbon recovery; and.'was instead'.'compri .the effectiveriess .of the . <br /> existin s stem J <br /> g Y <br /> • , The nature�of your. August. 8, 1995 request regarding the temporary piping was <br />' disconcerting. It appears as'if-the connection` to the•original-three wells,-intended- <br /> r <br /> to.:only be temporary in nature, is _ risteadabeing considered by your-office as - <br /> -permanent. You requested engineering' c'alculations.'that we Were'to 'Have <br /> "71completed .-prior, to -installing the ;piping, and" made' suggestions '.regarding.,° <br /> relbeafmg the blower or increasing blower capacity These..suggestions' seemed <br /> k .prema#upe, given the fact that :the utility .of:permanently;iriCoxporaiing`wells <br /> VW 1; VW-2 and VW-3 had not yet been deterrriined. <br /> t <br /> Yspoken to _tlizabeth Thayer earl an�' the -life :of 'the . ro ect r'e ardin <br /> k x.. Y P J g - g <br /> '., techr►ical.�considerations -Find 6.her at.that time that <br /> ._I might..call her for. <br /> input,ai-a later date,should such-input be-required.'.She did:not suggestthat such x <br /> contact would beinappropriate <br /> I felt-,that it maybe beneficial to solicit her,iriput.prior,to. sending you a -response <br /> to _your-most recent';letter; as-.I. felt.it- would be helpful to get:a second-opinion $ <br /> regarding our approach The purpose:and tone of the :transmittal was'to.build `. . <br /> consensus, riot`"go:over your head" As of .the writing of this letter I have"not' <br /> n <br /> receiyed a_response-from Ms."Thayer. j <br /> -copy of the package submitted to Ms: Thayer is-attached.i.As you will..see the R <br /> draftA'tter I forwarded.to'h1.er for review..included sieveral recommendations <br /> regarding. . e. original wells and .proposed -system-modiffcations that-,woiild:- p <br /> serve"to.increase the overall- effecfiveness of the approach taken at this .'site. I ' <br /> believe Ithat' the Jisted recommendations,-if implemented, will serve to:,,greatly <br /> increase .tile,rate at:which s ,site.-is�reriiediated. '.These recommendations,'-for <br /> s the most..nart are=subs+aritial�y sire We.,ha �e dssed. o ¢r.::tl+e - <br /> course of this project: <br /> • As you are lkely:aware, Clearwater �s-no longer involved in.this project.- This is <br /> . 'no t necessarily a,'negative development ' I,.'hope that the firm chosen by Mrs.' . <br /> . Ekholmfto complete.activities�ai this -site will be able to,work-with. ou-to abrin <br /> g. <br /> vely <br /> this:,project to closure;quickly and cost effecti <br /> r : _ <br /> P. <br />