Laserfiche WebLink
NEUMTLLER & BEARDSLEE g;aw" <br /> 1, <br /> A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION•ATTORNEYS&COUNSELORS JUL 0 5 1954 ESTABLISHED 1903 <br /> ENVOONMENTAL HEALTH 22968-19159 <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> BROOKE K.BIRmE <br /> STOCKroN OFFICE.: <br /> 509 W.WEBER AVE. <br /> STocKrON,CA July 5 , 1994 <br /> 95203-3166 <br /> (209)948-8200 <br /> (209)948-4910 FAX <br /> MAILING ADDRESS: <br /> P.O.Box 20 Ms . Linda Turkatte, R.E.H. S. <br /> STocKrON,CA <br /> 95201-3020 San Joaquin County Public Health Services, <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> MODESTO post Office Box 209 <br /> (209)577-8200 <br /> (209)577-4910 Fax 445 North San Joaquin Street <br /> Stockton, California 95201 <br /> Re: 1702 Jackson, Escalon,._ CA <br /> Dear Ms. Turkatte: <br /> Your letter of July 5 , 1994, came as quite a shock to me. <br /> To recap, and as I mentioned in my June 30 , 1994 , letter <br /> to you, as soon as I learned that we were unable to meet <br /> that deadline of June 30 , 1994 , I informed you office of <br /> that fact. You have suggested in your letter of July 5 , <br /> 1994 , and our subsequent telephone conversation that no <br /> extension had been granted. To suggest that when neither <br /> you nor your supervisor were even in the office to review <br /> the CAP report if it hadn' t been submitted nor to deny any <br /> request for extension is difficult to understand. The <br /> purpose of my letter to you was to inform you of a problem <br /> and to tell you when it would be cured. Since today is <br /> your first day back from vacation and only the second <br /> working day after the deadline, submittal of a CAP should <br /> not disadvantage the County or our client in achieving the <br /> goal of cleaning up the site. In fact, again, we don' t <br /> quite frankly understand how submittal of an admittedly <br /> incomplete report to you on a day when you were not there <br /> to receive or review it, is better than submission of a <br /> corrected report to you upon your return. However, no one <br /> has been harmed and the intent of time of cleanup has been <br /> furthered. <br /> I am very sorry Linda, that we seemed to have gotten at <br /> loggerheads in this and I wish to reiterate again, that we <br /> do not wish to be at loggerheads and in fact, are <br /> addressing this problem with the consultant. As I have <br /> mentioned in my letter, a time line has been set so that <br /> any future delays are avoided. As I mentioned, we all are <br /> concerned that efforts are taken to avoid jeopardizing the <br /> status of SB 2004 Funds. These funds are essential for <br /> clean up of the site and a two day delay is a poor reason <br /> F:\TRN\19159\C\EKHOLZZ.BKB <br /> 22968-19159/jLk/07/05/94/1 <br />