Laserfiche WebLink
'92 1 2`5'a WATERI,JC C:ORF' <br /> 4 <br /> sr t c�u.s�a��sa Post-It'""brand fax transmittal memo 76'7'; 71 :L- <br /> S <br /> STATEwATER RESOURCECpNTR(31-BOARI] to �r� c14'jq!ccDIVISI tiN9 DF CLEAN WATER P#�GGiiAMS _L.q C6.2014T STREET. SUITE 130 =` J C X 13 <br /> P.O- Box 944212 [1epz. FPslafe r <br /> (916)73'x=2475aa•2�2� Fax Fax <br /> D Ica <br /> 4219 RZGI ON: 5 <br /> EKHOM PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP APR 2 71992 <br /> 1652 DANIELS <br /> ESCALON, CA 95320 <br /> ENWONMENTAL FEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES& <br /> DVDERGRAU>ND STCRACEC ANK CLECLEANUPF In PRAGAWHr IsOTICR O1¢ IN MPLETS OR <br /> IN SLIGIBLE CLAIM! <br /> A a result of a cursory review by our staff, your claim application tb the <br /> Underground Storage Tank (UST) cleanup Dund Program t~annat be a�cr��ted for <br /> the current priority list for the following reason(s) : <br /> ❑ claimant was never the owner or operator of the UST (Sec. 2810»1) . <br /> Where was no documentation submitted of an unauthorized release of <br /> petroleum from the UST (sec. 2811) (a) (1) or 2811 (b) ) . <br /> There was no documentation submitted that claimant complied with <br /> applicable requirements to have a permit to awn or operateKthe-: UST <br /> (Sec. 2811 (a) (2) or 2811(b) (1) or (2) ) . <br /> ciaim.ant is not in compliance with financial responsibility <br /> requirements (Sec. 2811(a) (3) or 281I (b) ) . <br /> ❑ corrective action was not in accordance with Chapter 6.7 of the Health <br /> & Safety Code or was not consistent with any orders, directives, etc. <br /> of the regulatory agencie8 (Sec. 2811(a) (4) and (5) or 2511(b) <br /> and(b) (4) <br /> Tank is not a qualifying UST (Sec. 2804 and 2810- 1) . <br /> Claimant knew of the unauthorized release prior to January 1, 1988 and <br /> failed to initiate corrective action on or before June 30, 1988 (Sec. <br /> 2810. 1(a) (4) ) <br /> Claimant purchased property on which the UST was located and failed to <br /> document (1) that the party from whom the property was acquired would <br /> have been eligible td submit a claim, or (2) claimant exercised <br /> reasonable diligence in determining whether an UST was located on the <br /> site and if an. UST was known, whether the site was contaminated (Sec. <br /> 2810 . 1 (b) ) . <br /> '' ❑ <br /> Claixa for third-party compensation costs failed to include <br /> documentation of a court-approved settlement, final judgement, etc. <br /> (Sec. 2811. 3 (a) ) . <br /> (over) <br />