My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003092
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JACKSON
>
1702
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545315
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 11:45:06 AM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:50:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003092
RECORD_ID
PR0545315
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003572
FACILITY_NAME
DAVES UNION SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
1702
STREET_NAME
JACKSON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
APN
227-14-011
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1702 JACKSON ST
P_LOCATION
06
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.3 Alternative 3 - Soil Vapor Extraction with Groundwater Monitorin <br /> This alternative involves remediation of impacted soils by vapor extraction with continued <br /> ' groundwater monitoring Initiation of a soil vapor extraction system would include the following <br /> activities preparing plans and specifications, obtaining necessary permits, and installing the <br /> ' vapor extraction piping, treatment compound, and off-gas treatment device (catalytic oxidizer <br /> or granular activated carbon) The vapor extraction system would be monitored at least monthly <br /> ' or at the frequency specified by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District <br /> (APCD) Groundwater monitoring would continue on a regular basis until it is determined that <br /> groundwater has not been impacted and the potential for groundwater impaction is limited <br /> 8.0 REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION <br /> Each of the alternatives presented above were evaluated according to the following criteria <br /> I Level of protection of human health and the environment <br /> 2 Reduction of toxicity, mobility and volume of contaminants <br /> 3 Compliance with regulatory guidelines <br /> 4 Cost effectiveness/public benefit <br /> 5 Short term effectiveness <br /> 6 Long term effectiveness <br /> 7 Implementability <br /> 8 Regulatory and community acceptance <br /> 8.1 Alternative 1 - Passive Remediation <br /> O Criterion 1 <br /> The passive remediation alternative has no immediate health based risks The site is <br /> rsecured to preclude public access so the possibility for exposure to humans by <br /> volatilization, dust or dermal contact with impacted soil is minimal, with little or no fire <br /> ' or explosion hazard The shallowest aquifer is located approximately 25 feet below the <br /> depth of impacted soil so the risk of impacting groundwater exists This aquifer is <br /> ' currently classified as a drinking water source but is not generally used as such <br /> 1500471REPORTs\CAF 0694 FNL 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.