Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> is a relatively low concentration The initial TPHg removal rate at a flowrate of 100 cfm <br /> ' is estimated to be 2 lbs/day <br /> ' O Due to the apparent low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon vapors in the vadose <br /> zone, vapor phase carbon appears to be the most effective off-gas treatment option should <br /> ' vapor extraction be instituted for soil remediation at the site <br /> 9.0 REFERENCES <br /> Department of Water Resources, Bulletin No 146, San Joaauin County Ground Water <br /> ' Investigation, July 1967 <br /> ' RESNA Industries, Problem Assessment Report, Soil Contamination, December 23, 1991 <br /> San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Lines of E ual Elevation <br /> ' of Water to-Wells, Spring 1991 <br /> ' San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Correspondence, Laune J Cotulla, September 16, <br /> 1991 <br /> 1 <br /> State Water Resources Control Department, LUFT Manual, October 1989 <br /> U S Geological Survey Professional Paper 1401-C, Geology of Fresh_Groundwater Basin <br /> ' of the Central Valley. California, with Texture Maps and Sections, 1986 <br /> ' U S Geological Survey Professional Paper 1401-D, Groundwater Flaw to the Central Valley. <br /> Cali ornta, 1989 <br /> 150047\R-031594 FNL 13 <br /> 1 <br />