Laserfiche WebLink
r r <br /> 1 <br /> Mr Chuck Carmel <br /> . February 14, 1994 <br /> Page 3 <br /> accomplished with two granular activated carbon (GAC) vessels, each having 1,000-pound <br /> capacity Groundwater is extracted from the well via a submersible pump Discharge of the <br /> treated groundwater is to the city industrial sewer system under Wastewater Discharge Permit <br /> No 151 issued by the City of Lodi: Public Works Department Installation and start-up of the <br /> GWETS occurred in October 1992 The GWETS was shut down on April 19, 1993, due to <br /> nondetectable concentrations of hydrocarbons in the water <br /> The SVETS consists of eight soil vapor extraction wells (VE-1, VE-2, VE-3, VE-4, VE-5, <br /> VE-6, VE-7 and VE-8) and a soil vapor treatment system The soil vapor treatment system <br /> is composed of a vacuum compressor pump followed by a King-Buck-Hasstech catalytic <br /> oxidizer that has a design treatment flow rate of 100 cubic feet per minute (cfm) of soil vapor <br /> The system is operated under Permit to Operate No N-1081-1-0 issued by San Joaquin Valley <br /> Unified Air Pollution Control District <br /> Operating Conditions This Quarter. The groundwater extraction and treatment system did <br /> not operate during the third quarter of 1993 <br /> The SVETS operated continuously at 100 ctm during this quarter Vapors were extracted <br /> from wells VE-3, VE-4, VE-6, VE-7 and VE-8 <br /> Results and Discussion The current, historical, and total concentrations of BTEX and TPH <br /> in the extracted soil vapor are shown in Table 4 The laboratory reports for the sampling <br /> events of the SVETS are presented in Exhibit B Influent concentrations appear to be steadily <br /> declining, indicating that the hydrocarbons are being successfully remediated <br /> Figure 2 shows the area thought to be influenced by operating VE-3, VE-4, VE-6, VE-7, and <br /> VE-8 at an average flow rate of 20 cfm (20 cfm is based on the assumption that the total flow <br /> rate of 100 cfm is distributed equally between these wells) This operational radius of <br /> influence (OROI) shown on Figure 2 is ten feet This is based on extrapolation of radius of <br /> influence measurements collected during the original vapor extraction test in 1990 Radius <br /> of influence was not measured during the March 1993 sampling of vapors <br /> The OROI is based on conservative assumptions related to soil venting These conservative <br /> assumptions are (1) the soil venting from individual wells do not influence neighbonng <br /> wells, or to be more specific, the influence on individual wells from soil vapor extraction is <br /> not cumulative, (2) radius of influence is based on vacuum pressures that are at, or above, <br /> 0 1-inch water cglumn, and (3) biological degradation of gasoline hydrocarbons is not <br /> • Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheer is subject to the restriction specified at the beginning of this <br /> document 7481 RLPORTSIAUG93 QTR RPT <br /> I <br />