Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Kyle Christie <br /> May 15, 1995 <br /> . Page 2 <br /> Before sampling, the wells were purged of a minimum of three well casing volumes, or until <br /> evacuated, using a submersible pump or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) bailer After purging, each <br /> well was sampled using a disposable bailer All groundwater samples were analyzed for <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) and total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPH-G) by U S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 503018020, and <br /> 8015 Modified Field data sheets and chain-of-custody documentation are included in <br /> Exhibit A <br /> Results and Discussion <br /> The general groundwater flow direction beneath the site on March 2, 1995 was to the south <br /> under a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0 002 (Figure 1) Wells W-2A and W-2B are not <br /> used for contouring because they are screened in different zones than the other wells Well <br /> W-4 was not used in contouring because it was dry, and well W-6 was not used because <br /> EMCON field personnel could not locate the well <br /> Since groundwater monitoring began in 1988, the general groundwater flow direction has <br /> ranged from southwest to southeast at this site The hydraulic gradient measured this quarter <br /> is within the range of previously reported gradients. Depth-to-water on March 2, 1995 ranged <br /> from 6109 in well W-8, to 64 07 in well W-9 Well W-4 was dry Water-level elevations <br /> • in all the measured monitoring wells except W-10 increased an average of 198 feet since the <br /> last quarterly monitoring event (December 19, 1994) Water level elevation data for <br /> monitoring well W-10 was not collected the last two quarters. The water level elevation in <br /> W-10 decreased 167 feet since it was last measured on March 22, 1994 Summaries of <br /> depth-to-water measurements and calculated groundwater elevations are presented in Table <br /> 1 Table 2 lists past and present groundwater flow directions and hydraulic gradients for this <br /> site. <br /> Neither BTEX or TPH-G were detected in any of the sampled wells These results are <br /> consistent with previous values First quarter 1995 sample results indicate that the <br /> December 19, 1994 data for W-5 for benzene (2 2 µg11) is anomalous The detection limit for <br /> benzene is 0 5 pg/1 and for TPH-G is 50 pg/l. Analytical results of groundwater samples are <br /> summarized in Table 3 The complete laboratory report for the sampling event is presented <br /> in Exhibit A Figure 2 shows TPH-G and BTEX concentrations for this sampling event. <br /> Status of Site Remediation <br /> This section provides a description of the remediation system and discusses the effectiveness <br /> of the remediation system operation <br /> • Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction specified at the beginning of this <br /> document <br /> 206SREPORTSM ST95QMJtYr <br />