Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kyle, Christie <br /> January 30, 1991 <br /> Page 5 <br /> installed bladder pumps driven by a portable control box and air compressor and were installed <br /> in each well to reduce the potential for cross-contamination and to simplify sampling procedures. <br /> A dedicated pump was not installed in monitoring well MW-4 du-, to lack of groundwater in the <br /> well. <br /> Prior to sample collection during the October groundwater sampling event, groundwater was <br /> purgf,d from each monitoring well by Brown and Caldwell Consultants personnel using the Well <br /> Wizards. The purged groundwater was stored in covered 55-gallon drums on-site. At the end <br /> of each sample event day,Armour Petroleum,Inc. (Armour) of Fairfield,California disposed of <br /> the groundwater. All of the water produced during the October groundwater sampling event was <br /> taken by Armour to the Solano County Fire Training Facility under bill of lading. While purging <br /> groundwater from each well, the pH, specific conductance, and volume of water purged was <br /> monitored. Table I represents this data. Approximately three well volumes of groundwater were <br /> evacuated from all sampled monitoring wells except W-2 and W-3. Due to slow recharge of <br /> groundwater into monitoring wells W-2 and W-3,2.28 and 0.8 well volumes,respectively, were <br /> evacuated from these wells. <br /> The wells were sampled using disposal polyvinyl chloride bailers equipped with bottom-emptying <br /> valves. The sample was drained directly from the bottom valve into four 40-milliliter glass <br /> bottles with teflon-lined septums. The samples were stored on ice from the time of collection <br /> through delivety to Brown and Caldwell's state-certified laboratory. <br /> Analytical Results <br /> Groundwater levels were measured at approximately 63 to 66 feet below ground surface in <br /> October 1990, and the groundwater flow direction was to the south to southwest under a <br /> hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.001. <br /> Dissolved BETX concentrations in groundwater samples collected during October 1990 are <br /> included in Table 2. October 1990 benzene concentrations are shown on Figure 3. Complete <br /> laboratory reports of the October 1990 groundwater sample analyses are enclosed as Appendix A. <br /> October 1990 analytical results show benzene concentrations in groundwater in monitoring wells <br /> W-lA, W-2, W-2B, W-3, W-6, W-7, W-9, W-10, and W-11 are greater than California <br /> Department of Health Services (DHS) Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). DHS MCLs for <br /> benzene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes are 1.0 parts per billion (ppb), 680 ppb, and 1,750 ppb, <br /> respectively. The concentration of xylenes in g-o-indwater monitoring well W-2 was above tile <br /> DHS MCL and below the DHS MCLs J-i all other monitoring wells. Ethylbenzene concentrations <br /> in groundwater in all monitoring wells sampled were below the DHS MCLs. Toluene was <br /> identified in concentrations greater than the DHS drinking water action level (action level" in <br /> ---monitoring-wells-W-2,-W-3, and W-9. <br /> BETX concentrations were not identified in off-site monitoring wells W-5, W-8. and W-12. <br />