Laserfiche WebLink
• KEI-P91-0202 .R6 <br /> January 23 , 1992 <br /> Page 5 <br /> RECENT FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> On December 16, 17 , 18 , 19 , & 20, 1991, six additional two-inch <br /> diameter monitoring wells and two exploratory borings (designated <br /> as MW4 through m19 and EBI and EB2 , respectively, on the attached <br /> Site Plan, Figure 1) were installed at the site. The wells were <br /> each drilled, constructed, and completed in accordance with the <br /> guidelines of the Regional Eater Quality Control Board (RWQCB) , and <br /> California Well Standards, per Bulletin 74-90 . <br /> The subsurface materials penetrated and details of the construction <br /> of the wells are described in the attached Boring Logs. <br /> The six wells were each drilled and completed to total depths <br /> ranging from 79 to 85 feet below grade, except for MW5, which was <br /> drilled and completed to a depth of 70 feet below grade. Ground <br /> water was encountered at depths ranging from 71. 5 to 75 feet <br /> beneath the surface during drilling, except in MW5, where ground <br /> water was encountered at a depth of 60 feet below grade. The <br /> exploratory borings were drilled to depths of 20. 5 and 21. 0 feet <br /> . below grade. Soil samples were taken for laboratory analysis and <br /> for lithologic logging purposes at a maximum spacing of 5 foot <br /> intervals, at significant changes in lithology, at obvious areas of <br /> contamination, and at or within the soil/ground water interface <br /> (except for EB1 and EB2 ) , beginning at a depth of approximately 4 <br /> to 5 feet below grade and continuing until ground water was <br /> encountered. Soil sampling conducted below the ground water table <br /> are for lithologic logging purposes only. The undisturbed soil <br /> samples were taken by driving a California-modified split-spoon <br /> sampler ahead of the drilling augers. The two-inch diameter brass <br /> liners holding the samples were sealed with aluminum foil, plastic <br /> caps and tape, and stored in a cooled ice chest for delivery to a <br /> certified laboratory. Each well casing was installed with a <br /> watertight cap and padlock. A round, watertight, flush-mounted <br /> well cover was cemented in place over each well casing. <br /> The surface of each well cover was surveyed by Kier & Wright of <br /> Pleasanton, California to MSL and to a vertical accuracy of 0. 01 <br /> feet. <br /> All wells were developed on December 26, 27 , 30, and 31, 1991 . <br /> Wells MW1 , MW2 , and MW3 were redeveloped as previously recommended <br /> by KEI . Prior to development, the wells were checked for the depth <br /> to the water table (using an electronic sounder) and the presence <br /> of free product (using an interface probe or paste tape) . No free <br /> • product was noted in any of the wells. After recording the <br /> monitoring data, the wells were purged (with a surface pump) of 50 <br /> to 81 gallons, except for wells MW5 and MW6, which were purged of <br /> 14 and 24 gallons, respectively (until the evacuated water was <br />