Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Michael Walton 0 <br /> Walton Engineering <br />' August 4, 1998 <br /> • storage tanks were unearthed and then removed by Walton Engineering, Inc , on June 30, 1998 <br /> Prior to removing the storage tanks from the ground,the tanks were rinsed and evacuated by Norcal <br /> I Oil of Modesto, California, and then approximately 300 pounds of dry ice was placed in each tank <br /> The dry ice displaced oxygen(O2) to less than 4% in each of the tanks and lowered the LEL (lower <br />' explosive limit) to less than 8% in each of the tanks After removing the storage tanks from the <br /> ground, the tanks were inspected and found to be in good condition The three tanks were hauled <br /> from the site and disposed of by West Coast Equipment of Turlock,California A representative from <br />' San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division (SJCEHD) was present to supervise the tank <br /> removal and soil sampling operation <br />' SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> Native soil strata encountered in the tank excavation at the site consisted of light brown silty sand and <br /> isand Field evidence for subsurface soil contamination was observed only beneath the eastern end <br /> of the former fuel dispenser island Minor soil contamination observed beneath the former fuel <br /> dispenser island was over excavated and removed from the subsurface prior to sample collection <br /> INative soil encountered in the tank excavation did not appear to have an odor of petroleum-based <br /> fuel hydrocarbons <br /> IAfter removing sandy tank backfill material from the open excavation, soil samples were collected <br /> from beneath each end of the three former underground fuel storage tanks (Figure 2) Native soil <br /> samples were collected from beneath each of the tanks (T1 through T3) at approximately 17 feet <br /> below ground surface by removing soil from the base of the excavation using an excavator and then <br /> immediately driving a clean sample sleeve into a relatively undisturbed part of the soil contained in <br />' the excavator bucket Each of these soil samples were collected by driving a stainless steel sample <br /> sleeve into the native soil using a hand-operated, AMS percussion core sampler Individual soil <br /> samples were collected in situ from beneath each end of the former fuel dispenser island (FD 1 and <br />' FD2 on Figure 2) <br /> Each individual sample sleeve containing a soil sample was sealed with plastic end caps,labeled with <br /> the project and sample identification numbers and date, and placed in iced storage immediately <br /> following sample collection The soil samples were delivered to the environmental laboratory, while <br /> adhering to the required chain of custody procedures (Appendix A) <br /> I <br /> STOCKPILE SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTION <br />' A total of four individual soil samples(representing one soil sample composite)were collected from <br /> every approximated 100 cubic yards of stockpiled soil material(Figure 2) Soil and backfill material <br /> removed from the open excavation during the tank removal operation was stockpiled on asphaltic- <br /> concrete adjacent to the open tank excavation Grayland collected a total of three soil sample <br /> composites from the soil stockpile (SP1) Each individual soil sample was collected using the <br /> percussion core sampler by first removing approximately 1 foot of soil/backfill material from the <br />' surface of the pile and then driving a clean stainless steel sleeve into the freshly exposed surface of <br /> . the pile Grayland collected two additional soil sample composites from the soil and backfill material <br /> I <br /> GRA YLAND ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> Grayland 022-140 trr 2 <br />