My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536908
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2020 4:15:46 PM
Creation date
2/12/2020 9:18:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM
RECORD_ID
PR0536908
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0021186
FACILITY_NAME
INDUSTRIAL DRIVE RECEIVERSHIP ESTAT
STREET_NUMBER
248
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17728020
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. SOIL MATRIX SAMPLING <br /> Three soil borings (SB-1001, -1002, and -1003) were placed adjacent to the septic tanks <br /> (Figure 2). Boring SB-2 was placed within the leach field of the septic system. Two borings <br /> (SB-1003 and -1007) were placed adjacent to the former location of a UST located at the <br /> southeast corner of the building. One boring (SB-5) was placed in the backfill of the former <br /> location of a UST east of the main building. One boring (SB-4) was placed west of the septic <br /> system after it was determined that groundwater moves in a westerly direction. The final <br /> boring (SB-7) was placed near a concrete patch inside the building. Refer to Figure 3 for well <br /> locations around the septic system. <br /> Discrete soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis at selected depths in all borings. <br /> Disposable gloves (changed between each sample) were utilized to limit cross-contamination <br /> between samples. Soil samples were collected in one-foot-long by 1.5-inch-diameter clear <br /> acetate sleeves cut from 4-foot-long sampling sleeves (direct-push samples). The soil samples <br /> were sealed with TeflonTM sheets, capped, and placed in a cooler maintained at 4°C with ice. <br /> Soil samples were transferred to a California-certified fixed-base laboratory(Enviro-Chem) for <br /> analysis under chains-of-custody. <br /> All soil samples were analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B and for Total Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbons (TPH - carbon-chain lengths identified) by USEPA Method 8015B. Chains-of- <br /> custody are provided, together with the laboratory reports, in Appendix B. <br /> E. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> Groundwater was encountered at approximately 27 feet bgs in all seven temporary <br /> groundwater monitoring wells installed (SB-1 through SB-7). Groundwater samples were <br /> collected with disposable bailers from each temporary monitoring well. (See Appendix C for <br /> well construction details.) <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B and for TPH-cc by <br /> USEPA Method 8015B. Laboratory reports and chains-of-custody are provided in Appendix <br /> B. <br /> The tops of the temporary well casings were surveyed relative to the surface elevation of the <br /> property(approximately 13 feet above mean sea level(msl)). By using these elevation data and <br /> by measuring the depth to groundwater in the well casing, the elevation of groundwater in each <br /> temporary well was calculated, plotted, and contoured (Figure 3). The resulting groundwater <br /> surface has an overall dip to the northwest/west. The groundwater high at SB-1002 may be <br /> due to the leach field beneath this location. The groundwater low beneath SB-1005 may be <br /> due to the excavation pit at that location. The distribution of benzene and 1,2-DCP in <br /> groundwater (concentrations apparently decrease from southeast to northwest) is explained by <br /> the direction of groundwater movement (from southeast to northwest), as suggested by Figure <br /> 4. <br /> Addendum to Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report Pinnacle Environmental,Inc. <br /> 248 Industrial Avenue,Stockton,CA 95206 Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.