Laserfiche WebLink
. Page 2 of 2 <br /> • <br /> to acceptable levels in the source area. <br /> The remediation options reviewed by the EHD, continuing with the second 30-day pilot test or installing a <br /> permanent DPE system, and the associated costs, lead the EHD to the opinion that the second pilot test is the <br /> preferred option, but this should be discussed in detail with your consultant who has worked on the site in greater <br /> detail than the EHD. You mentioned a bioremediation option which the EHD had not been appraised of at the time <br /> of the discussion and therefore cannot comment on it. <br /> The goal of an active remediation system on the site would be to reduce contaminant masses so that the site will <br /> fit the closure profile of sites according to Appendix A of the Tri-Regional Guidelines or the LTCP. The site has not <br /> been reviewed in great detail by the EHD for the discussion earlier today, but based on the EHD's limited review <br /> and knowledge of the site as described above, the EHD is of the opinion that the second 30-day DPE pilot test <br /> should be implemented and evaluated; however, the EHD will carefully consider your consultant's <br /> recommendations and reasoning for how to bring the site to closure. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Nuel Henderson, PG and Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209)468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartneyna sjcehd.com <br /> 1/25/2013 <br />