My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 3
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LARCH
>
425
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541913
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 5:53:25 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 11:52:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 3
RECORD_ID
PR0541913
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024043
FACILITY_NAME
FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
425
STREET_NAME
LARCH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
21220009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
425 LARCH RD
P_LOCATION
03
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 4 of 7 <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209)468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartney(cDsicehd.com <br /> <image001.gifl <br /> From: Javad Masoudi rmailto•imasoudi(alemscorp.us] <br /> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 1:27 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH1 <br /> Subject: Re: work plan for groundwater remediation at Frontier <br /> Transportation Facility in Tracy <br /> Good afternoon Vicki <br /> Thank you very much for your comments. This is very good. <br /> I did not upload the plan to Geotracker. I decided to wait for your <br /> comments. <br /> I will correct/edit the work plan per your instructions and upload it <br /> onto Geotracker .. <br /> Have a good weekend. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Javad <br /> On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:01 PM, "Vicki McCartney [EH]" <br /> <vmccartneyna,sicehd.com> wrote: <br /> Good morning Javad, <br /> I have reviewed the well destruction work plan and have <br /> given the work plan to Nuel Henderson today to review and <br /> comment. <br /> I did not find the work plan in GeoTacker. If you have not <br /> already uploaded the work plan, please make the following <br /> corrections to the work plan prior to uploading it. <br /> Table 1, you indicate that there was no contamination in <br /> soil and groundwater collected from MW-3R. This is not <br /> correct. Contamination was found in both soil and <br /> groundwater from MW-3R and this well must be drilled out, <br /> not pressure grouted. (Also, DPE10 (s) did not have <br /> contamination in the soil samples.) <br /> Figure 1 is not included in the work plan, but Figure 3 is <br /> and it is difficult to read this well location map. <br /> Figure 2 illustrates that cementtbentonite slurry will be used <br /> but the narrative states that neat cement will be used to <br /> grout the annular seal. Please use neat cement and <br /> correct Figure 2. <br /> You did not mention using a tremie pipe, nor did you <br /> mention what pressure will be applied, nor the length of <br /> time the pressure will be applied when pressure grouting. <br /> have reviewed previous reports and was able to find <br /> documentation for all wells except MW-10 and MW_ <br /> 11 stating that eight-inch augers were used when installing <br /> The wells. (You can use eight-inch augers to destroy wells <br /> 4/25/2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.