Laserfiche WebLink
Interim Corrective Action Plan <br /> Frontier Transportation, Inc. <br />' December 20, 2005 <br /> Page 4 <br />' 4.1) Contaminant Mass <br /> 4 <br /> TPH-gas was identifieA/at a maximum of 2,500 ppm (mg/kg) during the May 2002 <br /> excavation in sample "Bot WNS" t�tom-west, north side The same sample identified r <br /> MTBE at a maximum of 26,000 pa s per billion (ppb) and benzene at 27,000 ppn I�d <br /> According to BEII, this sample was taken from the bottom of the groundwater-flooded <br /> excavation pit Soil samples taken above groundwater level do not We contaminant levels ? <br /> that are as elevated as groundwater samples or soil samples collected dove groundwater <br /> level Groundwater chemistry demonstrates that MTBE tends to stay in the water phase <br />' (Appendix A) This is apparent at the site, since elevated levels of contaminants typically <br /> begin at 10' bgs, where first water levels are seen (See Table 2 for analytical results of <br /> previous soil samples ) The previous results show that adsorbed phase is limited to the <br /> source area, which has been partially excavated in May 2002 <br />' During September 2005 groundwater monitoring, MW-21 identified dissolved TPH- <br /> gas at 12,000 ppb, dissolved benzene at 814 ppb and dissolved MTBE at 8,750 ppb (See <br /> Table 1 and Figures 4, 5 and 6 ) Dissolved MTBE was identified in the westernmost well, <br />' MW-9 (screened from 5' bgs to 20' bgs), at a maximum of 1,600 ppb in June 2005 Low <br /> levels of dis1 <br /> Ll <br /> MT$E_l pve been detected in the deeper screened wells (30' bgs to 40' <br /> bgs) MW- and Mw-1 alculations of total mass of dissolved contaminants were based <br />' on the September 2005 groundwater monitoring event (see Appendix B for calculations) <br /> The mass of TPH-gas dissolved in groundwater was determined to be in the range of 5,000 <br /> to 7,500 grams Dissolved benzene was at a much lower level ranging near 100 grams <br />' Total dissolved MTBE was calculated to be approximately 4,000 to 6,000 grams <br />' 4.2) Ozone Injection / Sparging <br /> Ozone sparging has been found to be effective in safe mass removal in Region 5 of the <br />' State Water Resources Quality Control Board In Situ Ozone sparging is described as <br /> follows <br /> Ozone sparging consists of injecting ozone (03) into the aquifer Ozone reacts with <br />' fuel oxygenates and oxidizes these compounds This oxidizing reaction converts <br /> MTBE to TBA to TBF to acetone Any unused ozone degrades to Oz, thereby <br /> increasing the dissolved oxygen concentration in the groundwater and stimulating <br />' microbial activity The ozone must be generated on-site due to its rapid degradation <br /> to oxygen (Jenkins, Kleinfelder Inc ) A typical ozone generator/compressor will cost <br /> approximately $50,000 - $80,000 depending on the pounds of ozone required for <br />' treatment In order to maximize the delivery of ozone, a distribution system using a <br /> timed solenoid branching system would be used <br /> I <br /> I <br />