My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004491
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LARCH
>
425
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541913
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004491
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 11:55:27 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 1:58:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004491
RECORD_ID
PR0541913
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024043
FACILITY_NAME
FRONTIER TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
425
STREET_NAME
LARCH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
21220009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
425 LARCH RD
P_LOCATION
03
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Interim Corrective Action Plan <br /> Frontier Transportation, Inc. <br /> I December 20, 2005 <br /> Page 6 <br /> from $200,000 00 to 250,000 00 Annual costs to operate and maintain the system are <br /> approximately $18,000 00, excluding laboratory analysis fees <br /> 4.3) Excavation <br /> The area of highest contamination is near MW-3R, where the tanks were originally <br /> located This area is bounded to the west by a steel building and to the east by Industrial <br /> Way There are several possible options for excavating this area to remove the remaining <br /> contaminant source shoring, pile driving, and stepping Both shoring and pile driving <br /> increase the excavation costs extensively Stepping the excavation area by cutting five feet <br /> down then five feet in will eliminate the need for shoring However, this will also move the <br /> area of excavation away from the contaminant source near the building wall Further <br /> difficulties lie with groundwater recharge BEII found that water seeped into the excavation <br /> pit from the sidewalls and prevented complete excavation <br /> I �L� <br /> Based upon previous excavations, the volume that will need to be excavated within <br /> the 30' x 30' area will total between 1,200 and 1,500 tons Much of the excavated soil will <br /> be clean backfill, so the amount of contaminated soil should be less than half of this number <br /> For safety and efficiency, shoring would need to be in place Shonng would need to be <br /> placed along the eastern wall of excavation pit, near the adjacent building If necessary, <br /> shoring would also need to be placed along the western wall of the excavation pit, near the <br /> adjacent sidewalk on Industrial Way Additionally, water pumping, storage, and removal <br /> would be required during the excavation (as evidenced by the previous excavation) Total <br /> Icosts for excavation are estimated at $150,000 00 to $250,000 00 depending upon the extent <br /> of excavation and shoring, water pumping and waste disposal costs With these cost and <br /> feasibility limitations, excavation is not an effective method to remove contamination at this <br />' site <br />' 4.4) Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) <br /> The cost of in situ SVE is site-specific, depending on the size of the site, the nature <br />' and amount of contamination, and the hydrogeological setting (EPA, July 1989) These <br /> factors affect the number of wells, the blower capacity and vacuum level required, and the <br /> length of time required to remediate the site A requirement for off-gas treatment adds <br />' significantly to the cost Water is also frequently extracted during the process and usually <br /> requires treatment prior to disposal, further adding to the cost <br /> I <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.