Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 20032 d Quarter Groundwater Report <br /> Frontier Transportation <br /> August 6, 2003 <br />' Page 3 <br /> excavation backfill material, which was coarser than the native soil The permeability difference <br />' between the backfill material and native soil can cause groundwater to accumulate within the <br /> backfill material as it flows in the downgradient western direction Historic groundwater data <br /> identified a west or southwest flow beneath the site <br />' 4.0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS <br />' On June 26, 2003, BEII contracted Del-Tech to collect groundwater samples from <br /> monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-13 for laboratory analysis Groundwater parameters (pH, <br /> temperature, and conductivity) were measured before, during, and after well purging (See <br /> Appendix A for Monitoring Well Field Logs) Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH-d, <br /> TPH-g, TPH-m, BTEX, and MTBE using EPA methods 8015 modified for diesel 8015 modified +� <br /> for gasoline, 8015 modified for motor oil, 8020 for BTEX, and 8260 for MTBE, respectively J4 <br /> t Laboratory analysis results for all monitoring episodes are presented in Table 1 Recent <br /> analytical reports are included as Appendix B <br />' Historical groundwater data has identified dissolved TPH-m in monitoring well MW-3 , d <br /> exclusively Maximum concentrations of dissolved TPH-m were identified in MW-3 as 33,000 Gam p� - <br /> n/L in January 2000 using EPA method 8015 modified In January 2000, the well cover for <br /> MW-3 was destroyed allowing oily surface water to infiltrate the well BEII concludes that the <br /> damaged well cover caused the increase in TPH-m in MW-3 from November 1999 to May 2000 <br />' Dissolved TPH-m concentrations have remained non-detect at the site since September 2000, <br /> when the well cover was repaired BEII, therefore, has discontinued groundwater sample <br /> analysis for TPH-m at the site <br />' <br /> Laboratory analysis identified dissolved TPH-d in monitoring well MW-3 at a maximum <br /> Y <br /> concentration of 33,000 µg/L in January 2000 However, the groundwater results were reported <br /> as TPH-d and TPH-m combined Since then, dissolved TPH-d concentrations in MW-3 have <br /> attenuated to non-detect in April, August, and November of 2001 Groundwater analysis results <br /> from April 2002 identified dissolved TPH-d exclusively from MW-3 as 14,200 µg/L-_The <br /> groundwater level in MW-3 dropped to its lowest recorded depth (10 72') in April 2002 <br /> Monitoring well MW-3 was abandoned in May 2002 Replacement well MW-3R identified no <br />' detectable concentrations of dissolved TPH-d No other detectable concentrations of dissolved <br /> TPH-d were identified from laboratory analysis in any of the wells sampled since then, which <br /> includes the second quarter 2003 sampling episode Groundwater analysis for TPH-d will <br />' continue to be performed for the site <br /> Historical groundter monitoring results have identified TPH-g concentrations above <br /> 1,000 µg/L in MW-1rid lW-3 only Maximum dissolved TPH-g concentrations were <br /> 1 3 <br /> . IL }t,0 <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />