My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT 1999
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
55
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009302
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT 1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 7:22:23 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 2:43:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT 1999
RECORD_ID
PR0009302
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004002
FACILITY_NAME
MORTON-ALCO
STREET_NUMBER
55
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13737004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
55 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> from <5 mg/kg to 130 mg/kg at Area 2A. Typical background arsenic concentrations <br /> reported by Bradford, et al (1996) ranged from 0.59 to 11 mg/kg for soils collected <br /> throughout California. The U.S. EPA Region 9 (1999) residential preliminary <br /> remediation goal (PRG) for arsenic (cancer endpoint) is 0.39 mg/kg and 22 mg/kg for the <br /> non-cancer endpoint. The industrial soil PRG is 2.7 mg/kg for the cancer endpoint and <br /> 440 mg/kg for the noncancer endpoint. The representative soil concentration used in the <br /> risk calculations for Area 2A was 8.9 mg/kg which exceeds the residential EPA Region 9 <br /> ' PRG. Further evaluation of natural background concentrations of arsenic in the Stockton <br /> area should be considered prior to implementing remedial actions at Area 2A. <br /> ' For lead, the representative Area 2A lead concentration of 93 mg/kg in soils was less than <br /> the child receptor-based lead in soil target concentration and the industrial receptor-based <br /> lead in soil target concentration. Consequently, the soil lead concentrations in Area 2A <br /> do not appear to represent a potential health hazard. <br /> 2.2 Area 2B <br /> Table B-6 presents the results of the noncarcinogenic hazard and carcinogenic risk <br /> evaluation for Area 2B. Noncarcinogenic HIs were less than one for all of the receptors <br /> evaluated. <br /> Excess cancer risks for the construction worker and landscape maintenance worker were <br /> 1.96E-06 and 4.89E-05, respectively. These excess cancer risks are well within the <br /> acceptable range of 1E-04 to 1E-06 for non-residential site uses. Excess cancer risk for <br /> the resident was 1.55E-04, two orders of magnitude higher than the acceptable risk of <br /> 1 E-06 for residential site use. The elevated excess cancer risk is primarily attributable to <br /> the presence of benzo(a)pyrene in soil, which was detected in one soil sample at a <br /> concentration of 1,020 µg/kg at a depth of 1.0 foot below ground surface. The soil data <br /> suggests that there may be a localized area of PAHs in Area 2B. <br /> SOMA 99-2218 16 12/10/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.