My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY 2000
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
55
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009302
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY 2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 5:43:41 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 3:16:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
REVISED FEASIBILITY STUDY 2000
RECORD_ID
PR0009302
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004002
FACILITY_NAME
MORTON-ALCO
STREET_NUMBER
55
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13737004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
55 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7h3adWe11&R0110 <br /> • <br /> TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> (Continued) <br /> 4.2 Comparison of Soil Remedial Alternatives...........................................................22 <br /> 4.2.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment.......................23 <br /> 4.2.2 ARAR Compliant .................................................................................... <br /> 4.2.3 Long-Term Effectiveness...........................................................................23 <br /> 4.2.4 Short-Term Effectiveness ..........................................................................24 <br /> 4.2.5 Reduction of Toxicity/Mobility/Volume...................................................24 <br /> 4.2.6 Implementability........................................................................................25 <br /> 4.2.7 Regulatory Acceptance..............................................................................26 <br /> 4.2.8 Community Acceptance.............................................................................26 <br /> 4.2.9 Cost......... ........... ..............................................26 <br /> 32 <br /> 4.3 Groundwater Remedial Alternatives Initial Screening.......................................... <br /> 4.3.1 Monitoring Only ........................................................................................33 <br /> 4.3.2 Collection...................................................................................................33 <br /> 4.3.3 Treatment...................................................................................................33 <br /> 4.3.4 Containment...............................................................................................34 <br /> 4.4 Comparison of Groundwater Remedial Alternatives.............................................34 <br /> • 4.4.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment ...35 <br /> 4.4.2 ARAR Compliant ............................................................. .................... <br /> 4.4.3 Long-Term Effectiveness...........................................................................35 <br /> 4.4.4 Short-Term Effectiveness ..........................................................................35 <br /> 4.4.5 Reduction of Toxicity/Mobility/Volume...................................................36 <br /> 4.4.6 Implementability........................................................................................36 <br /> 4.4.7 Regulatory Acceptance..............................................................................36 <br /> 4.4.8 Community Acceptance.............................................................................37 <br /> 4.4.9 Cost............................................................................................................37 <br /> 5.0 RECOMMENDED REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES........................................................39 <br /> 5.1 Operable Unit 1......................................................................................................39 <br /> 5.2 Operable Unit 2......................................................................................................40 <br /> FIGURES <br /> TABLES <br /> APPENDIX A <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.