Laserfiche WebLink
Report of Findings—Phase H Soil anu groundwater Assessment Page 8 <br /> Teixeira-Souza Dairy February 1,2007 <br /> WKA No. 6504.45 <br /> an MCL for nitrates, as previously discussed. Although the WDR also requires submittal of a <br /> Closure Plan prior to and a Closure Report after cessation of dairy operations, the WDR is <br /> currently considered tentative and may be refined before finalized. <br /> WKA contacted Mr. Michael Huggins, Confined Animal Facility Program Manager for the <br /> SJCEHD,to discuss dairy closure requirements and agency criteria for evaluating residual <br /> impacts to soil and groundwater quality. Mr. Huggins informed WKA that the SJCEHD <br /> currently does not have formal closure criteria for dairies, with the exception of removing all <br /> related surface features and wastes, along with excavating and removing visually affected soil <br /> beneath previous livestock areas and wastewater ponds. Mr. Huggins also stressed the necessity <br /> to identify and remove buried animal remains that may pose a health exposure risk as part of <br /> future land development. Mr. Huggins referred WKA to the RWQCB's Confined Animal <br /> Facilities Unit for further information on evaluating the significance of remaining soil and <br /> groundwater conditions after dairy closure activities. <br /> According to Mr. David Sholes of the RWQCB's Confined Animal Facilities Unit, there are <br /> currently no regulatory criteria defining allowable limits for nitrogen, phosphorous, and <br /> potassium related compounds in soil for the protection of groundwater quality. Upon discussing <br /> the results of this assessment with Mr. Sholes, it was his recommendation that depending on the <br /> planned future use of the property, elevated nitrogen-affected soils be excavated and removed to <br /> the maximum extent that is practically feasible as a measure of source reduction to minimize the <br /> potential for future methane generation and lingering impacts to groundwater quality. <br /> WKA then contacted Ms. Charlene Herbst, the RWQCB's Confined Animal Facility Program <br /> Director to discuss the results of this assessment and to clarify specifics of the RWQCB's <br /> tentative WDR. Ms. Herbst informed WKA that requirements in the WDR are intended to <br /> provide the RWQCB with a mechanism to collect and evaluate assessment data so that cleanup <br /> goals can be refined in the future. Until the WDR is finalized, Ms. Herbst's recommendation for <br /> dairy closures was to remove all visible and reasonable accessible waste materials, including <br /> wastewater pond areas, and reduce surface water runoff of dairy related constituents. Ms. Herbst <br /> stated that there is currently no general RWQCB requirement for groundwater extraction at <br /> active or former dairies to reduce nitrates and nitrogen related compounds in groundwater. Ms. <br /> Herbst suggested that establishing a setback requirement or deed restriction would be a prudent <br /> administrative measure to prevent the future use of groundwater immediately beneath or adjacent <br /> to previous dairy operations. <br />