My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
15
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0528915
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2020 5:09:01 PM
Creation date
2/20/2020 1:44:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0528915
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0019374
FACILITY_NAME
WALGREENS DRUG STORE
STREET_NUMBER
15
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12707026
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
15 W HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.5 Soil Vapor Sample Collection <br /> On November 20 and 24, 2008, Bureau Veritas installed soil vapor probes within BV-4 and BV-5 <br /> at 5 feet and 15 feet bgs, and in BV-6 at 5 feet and 12 feet bgs. Soil vapor probes were <br /> constructed of Teflon tubing with particulate end filters. Sand packs were placed around the <br /> particulate filters and dry bentonite covered the sand packs with intermediate areas of the <br /> bentonite seals being hydrated with distilled water using a tremmie pipe, until the borehole was <br /> sealed to the surface. The soil vapor probes were allowed to stabilize from 30 minutes to over two <br /> hours prior to sample collection. The soil vapor sampling was conducted in accordance with the <br /> guidance provided in the San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (RWQCB) Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil and <br /> Groundwater(RWQCB, 2005), California Department of Toxic Substances Control/Los Angeles <br /> RWQCB Advisory—Active Soil Gas Investigations(DTSC/LARWQCB, 2003), and DTSC's <br /> Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air(DTSC, <br /> 2005). <br /> The purge volume of the proposed soil vapor monitoring probes and sample manifold was <br /> calculated and approximately three volumes of the tubing, probe tip, and sampling manifold were <br /> purged prior to sample collection. The sampling and purging systems were setup using a certified <br /> clean manifold system with a laboratory-calibrated flow controller connected to a 6 Liter <br /> SUMMA TM canister and a purge canister. Each canister had its own vacuum gauge. The <br /> SUMMA TM canister flow controllers were requested for a sample rate of 100 to 200 milliliters per <br /> minute(ml/min). The SUMMA TM canisters and flow controllers were certified as clean prior to use <br /> and were provided by the analytical laboratory. <br /> Prior to sampling, a vacuum test was conducted after the sampling manifold and SUMMA <br /> canisters were connected to the soil-vapor probe. The valve on the manifold connected to the soil <br /> vapor probe and the valve on the sample canister were kept closed while the purge canister valve <br /> was opened for a period of 5 to 10 minutes while the pressure gauge on the purge canister was <br /> monitored. In each test, no observable drop in pressure was noted. The purge process was then <br /> initiated by opening the manifold valve to the soil-vapor probe. After an appropriate drop in <br /> pressure(that corresponded to the calculated purge volume)was recorded on the purge canister, <br /> the purge canister valve was closed and the sample canister valve was opened to start the <br /> sample collection process. <br /> The soil vapor samples were generally collected over an approximate '/z hour to one hour period; <br /> the actual sample intervals varied from 32 to 72 minutes. Sample BV-6-5'was left open for 215 <br /> minutes; however, the soil conditions were tight and no usable sample was collected (total <br /> pressure drop was only-5 inches). The initial vacuum in each canister was-30 or more inches of <br /> mercury, indicating that the canisters had not leaked prior to sampling. The samples were <br /> collected by opening the SUMMATm canister valves and then closing the valves after the sampling <br /> period. At the completion of the sampling period,the final vacuum in each SUMMA TM canister <br /> was recorded. The initial and final canister vacuums and sampling times were recorded on Soil <br /> Vapor Sampling Forms presented in Appendix D. <br /> During sampling, a tracer gas(isopropanol)was used as a leak check compound to confirm that <br /> the soil vapor monitoring probes and sample train were leak free. This compound was then <br /> analyzed for by the analytical laboratory to determine if there were surface or system leaks due to <br /> improper installation of the vapor inlet probe or system connections. The soil vapor samples were <br /> recorded on a COC document that accompanied the samples from the point of collection to the <br /> analytical laboratory. <br /> Once the soil vapor samples were collected, the soil vapor sample tubing was withdrawn from the <br /> borehole and a concrete surface plug was placed in the upper one-half foot of the boring, which <br /> was leveled to grade. <br /> 5 Project Number 99008-008321.03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.